Yet again the wind has taken my LF aerial down. It's always the same way with polypropolene rope just not strong enough, either loosing its strength though UV exposure or in last night's case sheer l
My earlier e-mail probably crossed with this one from Jim - for those unaware one of my roles on the RSGB HF Committee is to oversee LF matters, which included the administration of 73kHz NoVs. Hence
The list of NoVs (of those who agreed to their callsigns etc being used on a database for all to see) can be seen from a link on http://www.g3wkl.freeserve.co.uk/lf/73kHz.html. 73 John, G3WKL --Origi
Sorry no - they stopped some while ago and we even made representations to them to issue a few more or allow some already issued to be "swapped". So if someone is keen to experiment on 73kHz they wil
Further to Andy, G4JNT's talk at the LF Forum (RSGB HF COnvention) last weekend, and his article in RadCom, Frank, K0BRA, mentioned a cheap source of surplus Motorola ACS1397 8 Channel GPS modules fr
I was waiting to make an announcement and combine it with a comment on the 500kHz position, once a chairman for a proposed Working Group was agreed (see below), however, since Stewart has put his not
The reflector followed a manual e-mail, "snail" mail and packet exchange that I operated, between those interested in experimenting on 73kHz. That is before 136kHz was authorised here in the UK. As s
Fine! I personally don't mind as I find them interesting - the question is do the majority of the reflector users mind the scope of the reflector to broaden to include such technical intrigues? I mus
Whilst I don't like to intervene, for the sake of those who don't enjoy electronic puzzles could we bring this recent set of threads to a close when the latest puzzle has extracted suitable comment?
Yes, I intended that we should be able to offer papers from our amateur work for more elements than the one that expilicity mentioned Amateur Radio, hence the posting to this reflector! 73 John, G3WK
Our preference is not to attach files, but instead upload the files onto a website and post the URL 73 John, G3WKL --Original Message-- From: [email protected] [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_
A "Call for Papers" for the next IEE Conference on HF Radio Systems and Techniques (HF2003) has recently been announced (see http://conferences.iee.org/HF2003/). Interestingly, the "scope" of the Con
Hi Stewart - thanks for the interesting comments. The position is that I'm considering "buying" so can't do any tests. Not sure if outside the UK xDSL offerings use the same terms, thus "Engineer ass
Thanks for the comments guys - as I would expect all seems OK with the "Engineer Installed". Does anyone have any experience of the "Wires only", which to me seems more likely to be a problem? No-one
Can anyone advise on the basis of experience as to whether there are any problems with either "Wires only" or "Engineer installed" ADSL installation and the co-siting of one's LF station (or even HF
Arnie, nice to hear from you again and your comments on 500kHz are welcome. I think that we all recognise that it's not yet quite the time to expect to get an allocation at this part of the spectrum,
My apologies for not bringing to this group's attention before the outcome of a discussion of the RSGB paper on 500kHz, at the San Marino Region 1 Conference. AMRAD have usefully summarised the posit
Not sure whether this is news, but I've just received a copy of Poland's National Frequency Allocation Table that includes the following footnote: POL.1 The band 135.7-137.8 kHz may be used by amateu
I thought that I would do a re-send as whilst I have had some good responses I feel that we ought to have a few more volunteers, particularly from Region 1! So come on guys - the more volunteers that
