The reflector followed a manual e-mail, "snail" mail and packet exchange
that I operated, between those interested in experimenting on 73kHz. That
is before 136kHz was authorised here in the UK. As such it didn't have any
strict rules, except that it would be related to LF.
Given the broad user base that the reflector now has I'm quite prepared to
upload a general AUP for guidance to all on the purpose, scope and
etiquette - the question is whether we broaden the scope of the reflector as
I proposed, or leave it less well defined, but "weild a gavel" if off-topic
issues become too intrusive, as Steve Thompson suggested. This in effect is
what I did earlier this week, but it did gather some backlash.
73 John, G3WKL
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Ashlock,William
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 04:11
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: LF: RE: RE: Puzzles
Hi Gary,
> I also find the puzzles interesting but I this is not what the LF
reflector is meant to be used for.
I'm not sure what the LF reflector is meant to be used for. Are there are
some rules that I have failed to see posted?
> The future problem could be that in allowing this type of mail maybe
other types of mail may be sent
> therefore detracting from the whole purpose of the LF reflector.
What is the purpose of the LF reflector? Maybe if there is no set of rules
we could jointly agree on a set?
Bill Ashlock
_____________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by the WorldCom Internet
Managed Scanning Service - powered by MessageLabs. For further
information visit http://www.worldcom.com
|
