Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 147 ]

Total 147 documents matching your query.

81. Re: LF: QRSS (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 17:05:22 +0000
Hey, guys, is QRSS really computer generated? Wow, thats the reason all your signals are keyed thah exactly! I allways sit here and key down (to make things easier with my left foot) and slowly coun
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-03/msg00261.html (11,667 bytes)

82. Re: LF: QRSS (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 08:26:54 +0000
Being very close to applying my 136kHz DXCC (only 82 more DXCC countries needed) I was also very worried about this. Although QRSS is CW and as far as I know nothing is said about the transmitting sp
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-03/msg00272.html (11,023 bytes)

83. Re: LF: Decca Tx (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 17:17:43 +0000
The UK Decca Navigator transmitters shut down for public use this weekend. Most sites have already been sold for other purposes but a few will remain in working order for a few months. I might be ab
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-03/msg00273.html (9,293 bytes)

84. Re: LF: QRSS (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 09:36:26 +0000
No, what would be much more useful for some would be lessons in good manners on the air! For example, making sure that one does not call CQ bang on top of a QSO in progress. With only 2 khz of b/widt
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-03/msg00276.html (10,660 bytes)

85. Re: LF: QRSS (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 16:37:36 +0000
snip I live under Ringway flight path! MOVE if you are interested in LF Mike -- M.J.Powell
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-03/msg00279.html (9,839 bytes)

86. Re: LF: Re: Re. DECCA Tx (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 09:52:56 +0000
Laurie, I think you will find that you need to remove the 300 footer before trying the low height antenna- otherwise mutual coupling effects will surely stuff things up. And at 300 feet you will be
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-03/msg00287.html (10,379 bytes)

87. Re: LF: Fast CW and big antennas... (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 17:43:25 +0000
Why then did you criticize the ROPEX so much in your report. Surely the person who designed it, and marketed it deserves some credit. No one else rushed in to help Surprised you did not rectify the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-03/msg00290.html (9,118 bytes)

88. LF: TX CONSTRUCTION (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 07:38:09 +0000
Doing some construction lately, I have noticed how inaccurate some component values are. Good quality capacitors that I have been using are a long way out from the marked value. Also recommended turn
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-03/msg00298.html (8,787 bytes)

89. LF: CONFUSION (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 17:06:54 +0000
There seems to be some confusion about large and small vertical antennas on LF. Although the radiation patern(profile) is the same the INTENSITITY of the propogated signal is much greater from the la
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-03/msg00306.html (8,186 bytes)

90. LF: have or have not (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2000 16:51:41 +0000
It was nice to hear some constructive observations about various items from a Professor and radio amateur in a recent message. A good 100 ft strumech telescopic and tilt over tower costs over £2000 b
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-04/msg00005.html (9,225 bytes)

91. LF: re-inventing (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2000 16:45:40 +0000
LF techniques covering every aspect have been documented over the years and while some purport to be inventing new methods they are really copying what has gone before. The broadcast industry has cov
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-04/msg00025.html (9,577 bytes)

92. LF: French connection (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2000 11:10:18 +0000
Have the French gone underground on LF. Surprised nothing has developed since the last announcement of imminent activity some weeks ago. Mabye someone has an update. 73 de G3KEV
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-04/msg00026.html (7,869 bytes)

93. Re: LF: DJ9IE strongest yet ! (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2000 10:46:00 +0000
Hi Tony and All, DJ9IE is certainly putting out a good signal, but he seems to have great difficulty in hearing any of the numerous responses. He has been on calling CQ most of this week using what
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-04/msg00027.html (9,719 bytes)

94. Re: LF: DJ9IE strongest yet ! (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2000 11:17:20 +0000
I think that Uli, as several other DL's, is a victim of the 'Rhein-Main Syndrome' : due the the high concentration of high-power LF stations in that area the noiselevel seems to be extremely high an
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-04/msg00028.html (10,532 bytes)

95. Re: LF: Re: Re: Fast CW and big antennas... (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2000 08:56:54 +0000
G'day All, Regards Steve Olney VK2ZTO (P.S. I was going to add more letters here, eg., two Degrees Two degrees C or F ? and one Diploma, but I didn't want to appear to be a wanker, Is that a type of
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-04/msg00048.html (9,908 bytes)

96. Re: LF: LA conditions (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2000 15:21:57 +0000
Unfortunately, we had to cease transmission for an hour or so due to interference (hmm, those watts :-) Is listening on 136.3 for CW (normal and slow), and will transmit if anybody is heard. Will re
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-04/msg00049.html (9,420 bytes)

97. Re: LF: Decca Masts (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2000 16:57:16 +0000
<< Decca masts - latest situation. Agreement with Racal obtained. Schedule of available stations upcoming. RSGB notified; support of HF Cttee promised. Applications for possible NOV's in process. Fir
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-04/msg00062.html (11,174 bytes)

98. Re: LF: re-inventing (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2000 08:33:44 +0000
Hi Mal, Instead of just pointing us to the library, can you be a little more specific? What are the key articles to read and what references would be sufficient for the British Library to find them?
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-04/msg00063.html (11,030 bytes)

99. Re: LF: Decca Masts (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2000 07:54:58 +0000
<< This is exactly what the DMG is trying to avoid. If anyone wants to operate from these sites under his own licence using his own kit and his own callsign then he can do so without further ado usin
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-04/msg00072.html (11,252 bytes)

100. LF: Transatlantic 11 (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2000 20:06:07 +0000
Hi Larry and info to others. That seems an elaborate project for November and a lot of involvement. I will go across to Cookstown/Tyrone. N.I for the period Nov 10 - 27th. for the test. Mine is a mor
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-04/msg00085.html (9,340 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu