Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 77 ]

Total 77 documents matching your query.

61. Re: LF: IK1ODO beacon signal (score: 1)
Author: "M. Bruno" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 23:48:04 +0200
In 14.02 02/05/00 , hai scritto: Friday (28 april) arround 22UT I had a good copy of Marco's 10mW signal, both with Spectran and Spectogram. Some screenshots can be found at my webpage : http://www.q
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00020.html (10,734 bytes)

62. Re: LF: IK1ODO beacon signal (score: 1)
Author: "M. Bruno" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 23:48:32 +0200
In 14.02 02/05/00 , hai scritto: Friday (28 april) arround 22UT I had a good copy of Marco's 10mW signal, both with Spectran and Spectogram. Some screenshots can be found at my webpage : http://www.q
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00021.html (11,286 bytes)

63. Re: LF: Re: RF Thermo Couple Meter, calibration? (score: 1)
Author: "M. Bruno" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 6 May 2000 19:58:22 +0200
I always believed that you could calibrate true bolometric RF ammeters using DC? I've checked a couple of thermocouple RF ammeters and it seems to work. Martin Evans You can, if you calibrate in DC r
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00072.html (9,293 bytes)

64. Re: LF: DFCW Parameters (score: 1)
Author: "M. Bruno" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 21:22:36 +0200
ON7YD wrote: DFCW is still a very experimental mode, so not very standardized yet. Generaly accepted is that the higher frequency stands for 'dash' and the lower for 'dot'. The frequency shift is dep
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00109.html (12,896 bytes)

65. Re: LF: DFCW Parameters (score: 1)
Author: "M. Bruno" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 21:34:58 +0200
In my last msg the line wrap rendered the DFCW sample unreadable. See the attached file, it should be clear. 73 - Marco IK1ODO
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00112.html (9,855 bytes)

66. LF: DFCW Parameters and 1 Hz BWs (score: 1)
Author: "M. Bruno" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 20:56:31 +0200
PS : I (and I think several others) never got Spectogram running stable at 5.5kHz sample rate. Hello Rik, I'm testing the last version had from Alberto, and it seems to be stable. At least on my PC
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00132.html (10,894 bytes)

67. LF: DFCW beacon running (137.792) (score: 1)
Author: "M. Bruno" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 22:58:14 +0200
Talking about Spectran: IK1ODO, when and where do you begin your tests? Well, it's running now (2100z, friday), after some experimenting and soldering. The frequencies are: "space" 137.791; "dot" .7
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00168.html (10,841 bytes)

68. LF: Commercial CW on LF (score: 1)
Author: "M. Bruno" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 23:23:21 +0200
Yes, it is the station reportedly used by India to talk to its submarines 73 Andre' From the web site of IK1QFK: -- 18.2 kHz VTX3 is an Indian Navy traffic station. Operates from Vijananarayanam. Has
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00170.html (9,211 bytes)

69. Re: LF: Carriers on 137 Khz (score: 1)
Author: "M. Bruno" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 22:52:08 +0200
In 22.39 14/05/00 , hai scritto: Hi all, I have received some carriers with a 5 meters loop N/S. 135,8 KHz Signal = 7 RTTY 136 KHz Signal = 6 CARRIER 136,8 KHz Signal = 5 BURST 135,8 KHz Signal = 7 B
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00190.html (10,083 bytes)

70. LF: IK1ODO beacon running ... (score: 1)
Author: "M. Bruno" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 22:56:54 +0200
Hi all, my beacon is running from Friday evening, but I received no reception reports. The weekend was beautiful all around Europe ... all on seeside with the family ? (may be more relaxing than LF,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00191.html (9,005 bytes)

71. Re: LF: Spectran beta 3 - IK1ODO beacon running (2mW) (score: 1)
Author: "M. Bruno" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 21:59:11 +0200
Question to Marco : what was your ERP last night (+/- 22 UT) ? Would it be possible to decrease it with 3 to 6 dB, to allow to test Spectran on a really weak signal. It was at 10 mW. Now (tuesday ev
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00232.html (11,450 bytes)

72. Re: LF: Spectran beta 3 - IK1ODO beacon running (2mW) (score: 1)
Author: "M. Bruno" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 20:17:17 +0200
In 13.49 17/05/00 , hai scritto: Hello Marco & group, I'm sorry but it was absolute impossible to look for the 2mW signal last night. I started looking at 19.30UT (as nomally Marco's signal becomes v
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00250.html (11,057 bytes)

73. Re: LF: Re: LF receivers (score: 1)
Author: "M. Bruno" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 22:20:56 +0200
In 21.38 18/05/00 , hai scritto: I am working on the Receiver chapter for the LF book. I have a good introduction written by John 4GVC (with a description of the TS850, which caused many of us, inclu
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00274.html (9,907 bytes)

74. Re: LF: Re: LF receivers (score: 1)
Author: "M. Bruno" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 21:35:33 +0200
Marco et al .. I feel cheated - everyone else seems to have 1 Hz steps :-( Well, it is a software problem, the synthesizer IS CAPABLE of 1 Hz steps, but the software limits to 10 Hz. I can't explain
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00285.html (9,642 bytes)

75. Re: LF: Mutual couplingi of antennas at Puckeridge (score: 1)
Author: "M. Bruno" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 14:03:20 +0200
To All from PAoSE ... 73, Dick, PA0SE P.S.: Sorry for the vertical line at the left, I don't know how to get rid of it. </HTML> </x-html> Stop using Outlook .... ;-))) 73, Marco IK1ODO
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-06/msg00008.html (8,733 bytes)

76. LF: Slow CW, BPSK, machine modes (score: 1)
Author: "M. Bruno" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 14:17:11 +0200
The general consensus of opinion seems to be that if you are going to use "machine" modes, BPSK has considerable superiority over any form of slow CW for the kind of very weak signals often encounte
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-06/msg00009.html (10,520 bytes)

77. LF: M8 solar flare now ......... (score: 1)
Author: "M. Bruno" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2000 21:47:34 +0200
For anyone interested, an M- class (currently M8 level and rising) solar flare is in progress now (1947z). http://www.sec.noaa.gov/rt_plots/xray_5m.cgi 73, Marco IK1ODO
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-06/msg00035.html (9,263 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu