I'm more interested in WSPR15 vs WSPR2 vs OP32 :-) What are the ideas about this? I believe WSPR15 is better against WSPR2 on LF for long distances in the usual propagation Hi Alex. I am very intere
OPERA (I think, if I have it set up properly) on LF. Pretty much plug and play Paul , As long as the recovered tone falls inside the decoder pass band , can be set 1500 Hz or 2000 Hz mid band , notin
Hello LFers, Last night I had what could probably be considered a full call sign from DF2JP on DFCW. I got all the characters of DF6NM but not all at the same time. What is considered valid copy of a
I am running Opera on 136 only. To run on 477 would require me to stop monitoring WSPR2 to QSY the receiver, which I do not want to do. I see, thanks for explaining that the speed and decoder is link
I had partial copy of DF6NM on DFCW last night in the 0000z hour. Very bright trace on the 6 and N but QSB took out the rest. Around the same time (0033z) I had a Opera decode of DF2JP. Shortly after
I've been reading all this with great interest as I too am hoping to combine two LF PAs. On those fickle N1BUG contacts -- Yes, more and more so I fear. It's a subject for another thread but some key
2017-04-12 06 :48:30 DF2JP AA N1BUG FN55MF 0 136 -40 Op32__~40dB I don't understand Opera very well... But, I think this was a decode??? On my screen, using opera 1.6.4 in the lower pane it was in re
Thanks for the additional explanations Graham. That helps clarify things for me. I had five full decodes of 2E0ILY last night with no more than 5% fade on the worse of them. Looks like Opera is going
Oh my ! 2E0ILY is making improvements, I best set to work building that attenuator to protect my receiver... ;-) I realize one cannot directly compare S/N reported by different modes in different sof
Yes Graham, Down to one spot last night. I'm a bit confused though (my usual state). The decode last night occurred at 00:55 but your info shows 02:50. Why or how does that happen? This is not the fi
Nothing showing for n1bug in the data base this time , Impossible conditions here with noise floor +20 dB or more. This storm to my west produces so much lightning it's a steady roar, no breaks at al
I finally have my LF receiving setup active again. K2ORS is very audible 24 hours a day. I spotted WH2XND (on 138.000 WSPR) 99 times the first night back and 113 times the second night, so things see
Hi Mal, Not much activity planned on 630, though I may listen there for the next several nights. We have a big storm system coming this way that is already making too much noise on LF. 73, Paul LOOKI
I was very happy to provide your first TA report on MF in the previous season, Alberto. I hope we can do it on LF this time! I am continuing to monitor LF WSPR every night. So far I am only hearing t
I wish it were possible to have more WSPR-15 activity on LF. It seems like a very promising mode and would be much more interesting to me than Op32. Unfortunately for many of us the old WSPR-X softwa
Thanks Jay. I am far from knowledgeable about these materials but that agrees with measured performance of several receive bandpass filters I built for LF/MF last winter. I tried several different fe
Hello Chris, It seems WSPR-X is "conditionally stable". We had a fair bit of discussion about it on this side of the pond last winter. It works for some, but for others it doesn't. For me it stops do
That is great news, Luis. I am happy you are QRV again. I am monitoring LF WSPR-2 every night. Hope to receive you soon! Last season I received DC0DX, G8HUH, and 2E0ILY on LF WSPR-2. Last night DCF39
Propagation seemed good but I had heavy QRN from approaching storm here last night. 73, Paul N1BUG, WI2XTC Anyway it was a sourprise to get 30 stations reporting my signal in WSPR-2 LF. Or maybe anou
I wonder if anyone can help me with this. I built one of these: http://qrp-labs.com/ultimate3/u3mods/lfamp.html It's not what I want but it's what I can afford. In all cases, I was driving it with 25
