To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Mar 25-26 Best QRB/reports |
From: | N1BUG <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 27 Mar 2017 07:22:07 -0400 |
In-reply-to: | <CAL-VeeOTsgmWEdC7nsPSDmCkVZ-vDo96cw7i13AFUMtnP_g-7Q@mail.gmail.com> |
References: | <CAL-VeeNiY1-fhHCxgdZ-+GYGGJgzjfmZ0yCF8cXC1KhZQRko_Q@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAL-VeeOTsgmWEdC7nsPSDmCkVZ-vDo96cw7i13AFUMtnP_g-7Q@mail.gmail.com> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 |
On 03/27/2017 03:08 AM, Alex R7NT wrote: I'm more interested in WSPR15 vs WSPR2 vs OP32 :-) What are the ideas about this? I believe WSPR15 is better against WSPR2 on LF for long distances in the usual propagation Hi Alex. I am very interested in WSPR15.Unfortunately the only WSPR15 decoder seems to be WSPR-X software which many of us cannot use. It is always crashing, freezing, stopping on many PCs. If someday the developers put WSPR15 in the stable WSJT-X software (or someone writes another decoder software) then I think it has a chance to become more popular. I am waiting! When (if) there is a stable decoder I will listen for WSPR15 in parallel with WSPR2. 73, Paul N1BUG / WI2XTC FN55mf |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Mar 25-26 Best QRB/reports, Markus Vester |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: WSPR-15, DK7FC |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Mar 25-26 Best QRB/reports, Markus Vester |
Next by Thread: | LF: WSPR-15, DK7FC |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |