Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Mar 25-26 Best QRB/reports

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Mar 25-26 Best QRB/reports
From: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 07:22:07 -0400
In-reply-to: <CAL-VeeOTsgmWEdC7nsPSDmCkVZ-vDo96cw7i13AFUMtnP_g-7Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL-VeeNiY1-fhHCxgdZ-+GYGGJgzjfmZ0yCF8cXC1KhZQRko_Q@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAL-VeeOTsgmWEdC7nsPSDmCkVZ-vDo96cw7i13AFUMtnP_g-7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0
On 03/27/2017 03:08 AM, Alex R7NT wrote:

I'm more interested in WSPR15 vs WSPR2 vs OP32 :-)
What are the ideas about this?

I believe WSPR15 is better against WSPR2 on LF for long distances in
the usual propagation

Hi Alex.

I am very interested in WSPR15.

Unfortunately the only WSPR15 decoder seems to be WSPR-X software which many of us cannot use. It is always crashing, freezing, stopping on many PCs.

If someday the developers put WSPR15 in the stable WSJT-X software (or someone writes another decoder software) then I think it has a chance to become more popular. I am waiting!

When (if) there is a stable decoder I will listen for WSPR15 in parallel with WSPR2.

73,
Paul N1BUG / WI2XTC
FN55mf



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>