To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Mar 25-26 Best QRB/reports |
From: | Alex R7NT <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 27 Mar 2017 10:08:54 +0300 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=p+wUIoujGS/qhFE1vftnFb7iXS2MzH3nyuRMhakYEx0=; b=O4LMwJEAomm+bi0a9KDKfq2E24OdV4+q8INRggdHP95vWX7wPL+T8jSghAzjZKunP9 Sso6HxGoQwjncwABzkXn2r+PcIrbqjXEQ7TaadIIFL8H96Calw2bwkbanEjlNeKWOSAK IQlLp9ztfBMuns2q33gZ5tOGL8X/Qgtmj1lsKXQZgrGZdvtEuKR7jfdVARs/n28ShlnW uzOVHzHLp8rsZbAVul4y1FQHjZ7K44KY4oqIpRWUeJvqSEvVvaatEpuqNpsQF31HP0k6 W+J/2+//sF334wu+alg6WoKYoYbSRvPBhyb+OKpzgZ88VYwoAlWgTUUR+tKC6jlIM6KV 0gmQ== |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <CAL-VeeNiY1-fhHCxgdZ-+GYGGJgzjfmZ0yCF8cXC1KhZQRko_Q@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Marcus,
I believe these were popular errors:
....... I'm more interested in WSPR15 vs WSPR2 vs OP32 :-) What are the ideas about this? My beacon is now working this way: OP32 - 32min (1 time TX session) ~137.542 WSPR2 - next 13min (5 times TX sessions) ~137.538 - 544 WSPR15 - next 15min (1 timeTX session) ~137.602-603 Total 60min I believe WSPR15 is better against WSPR2 on LF for long distances in the usual propagation 73! Alex R7NT 136.73.ru 2017-03-27 0:29 GMT+03:00 Markus Vester <[email protected]>:
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: LF: DK7FC in Todmorden at 2970 Hz, hvanesce |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Mar 25-26 Best QRB/reports, Markus Vester |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Mar 25-26 Best QRB/reports, Markus Vester |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Mar 25-26 Best QRB/reports, Markus Vester |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |