G'day Bernd, worked DF6NM at 1100utc/281199; both O; the very first VFDKCW-QSO !!! Markus was operating the new qrs-mode: easy readable and saving time; plots are available on my page: index 5.1.1.4
G'day Malcolm, What if a QRSS proponent called aural only CW proponents "outdated" - "old-fashioned" - "behind the times". You wouldn't be able to see for days because of the the fur flying thick and
G'day All, ....and please don't start a fur and feather storm. I am NOT calling aural only CW proponents these things, it was only a "what if". It is divisive, pointless and downright inaccurate to d
G'day All, Here in VK-land although the regulations say there are no allocations below 10kHz and it APPEARS that there would be no restrictions, there is a document which sets out the bands for the C
G'day All, I think Kev has a good point here:- Another consideration is a person that has asymmetrical ears.!!! There could be 2 S points difference in your report depending whether he is listening t
G'day Renato, Message board - another valuable addition to your excellent site. Great work!!! Thanks. Have posted a message to the message board. Regards Steve
G'day All, There have been a bunch of C-level flares recently - peaking at around the 11th-12th March. It will be interesting to see if the Planetary A index rises to a high level as before and then
G'day All, All this talk about tall antennas and how good a 'fist' this or that person is concerns me. I feel it might give the wrong impression to the uninitiated to the world of LF Amateur Radio. I
G'day All, Thanks to the many who replied directly to me re my comments. I am encouraged that there is a 'silent majority' out there who share the same sentiments. The wisest reply pointed out that a
G'day All, Once again, thanks to all that have replied directly. I'm sorry but I can't reply to you all directly because of time restrictions. I must admit to be a little stirred up as it has become
G'day John, I got a little excited and pressed the send button before I had added the following... The reference to "re-inventing the wheel" actually came from conversations with our regulatory autho
G'day Kevin, LF techniques covering every aspect have been documented over the years and while some purport to be inventing new methods they are really copying what has gone before. Yes, I know but i
G'day All, I have a question about something that has puzzled me for some time now. It concerns the procedure for giving signal reports. I understand the scale for readability - no problem. The probl
G'day Bob, Geri and others, OK thanks. I have a clearer picture now. Doing a napkin analysis and taking into account the logarithmic nature of the S-meter readings, it seems that, for example, if you
G'day Kev, Finally, you have proved the case for myself and the vast majority of reflector members. Now perhaps we can get back to the 'signals'. Over and out good buddy. Kindest and sympathetic rega
G'day Kev, Appears I owe you an apology. I have checked with the Macquarie Dictionary Sales Department here and it seems the two page Aus edition you have is probably the special abridged export edit
G'day Toni, Here in VK anything below 9kHz is unrestricted as long a emissions at those frequencies do not produce products which extend into the 9kHz and above bands. I like the idea of this frequen
G'day Mike, If it does, it probably shows that the Solar Flare warnings are useless as this aurora was preceded by 2 C-class and 1 M-class flares which occur quite frequently. Yes, I have been follow
G'day Mike, Inetresting stuff. Thanks!!! locally but didn't upload them. The links are NOW on the Links page, then under Useful LF Pages. Regards Steve VK2ZTO
G'day Rik et al..., In theory there is no need for these 'gaps', but a series of tests (mainly conducted by DF8ZR, DF6NM and me) showed that these small 'gaps' had 2 advantages : 1. It eases the read
