Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 337 ]

Total 337 documents matching your query.

61. RE: LF: VLF/ULF activity weekend 21th/22th (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 18:18:08 -0500
Hello Paul, Does your sferic blanker fill the gap with zeros, or with interpolated values, or does it eliminate the gap? Or other? I have been planning to make a Matlab impulse post-processor that fi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-01/msg00173.html (14,388 bytes)

62. RE: LF: VLF/ULF activity weekend 21th/22th (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 00:44:05 -0500
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-01/msg00201.html (14,935 bytes)

63. LF: RE: Three dots (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 02:44:24 -0500
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-01/msg00227.html (15,251 bytes)

64. RE: ULF: EbNaut over 3 wavelengths on ULF (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2017 17:26:18 -0500
Paul, Excellent diagnostic method and implementation. Thanks also for applying the method to the ULF experiments, and to 3kHz propagation in general. I dont remember seeing a measurement of the type
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-01/msg00263.html (14,653 bytes)

65. RE: ULF: EbNaut over 3 wavelengths on ULF (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 15:26:37 -0500
Stefan and Paul, I've been unable to find any empirical validation of LWPC fidelity below 5kHz. Attached is a preliminary pass (E and B field amplitude vs frequency and distance) with FDTD, showing s
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-02/msg00018.html (14,852 bytes)

66. RE: ULF: EbNaut over 3 wavelengths on ULF (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 15:45:01 -0500
Stefan and Paul, The attached shows B-field FDTD results. Comparing with the E-field plot (previous message): the decorrelation of E and B in the region of interest (2kHz - 4kHz) is interesting. 73,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-02/msg00019.html (13,775 bytes)

67. RE: ULF: EbNaut over 3 wavelengths on ULF (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 07:51:29 -0500
Stefan and Paul, Attached is a 2nd-pass FDTD plot (E-field only); theoretically more accurate with some small corrections and refinements. The attached plot and the two FDTD plots sent yesterday repr
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-02/msg00023.html (16,246 bytes)

68. LF: RE: 5 wavelengths on 2970 Hz (?) | No 8270 from here today (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2017 15:58:46 -0500
A loose comparison of estimated DK7FC 2.97kHz signal strength in Cumiana (relative to a loosely validated 9kHz-4kHz LWPC reference points), to 4kHz-2.9kHz delta-B estimates from Pauls sferic spectrog
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-02/msg00043.html (15,745 bytes)

69. RE: ULF: EbNaut over 3 wavelengths on ULF (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2017 22:54:42 -0500
Stefan, Yes, good point, I'll replot with constant antenna current instead of constant ERP. 73, Jim Jim, i assume your plots refer to a constant ERP. Could you scale the plot to a constant antenna cu
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-02/msg00045.html (18,586 bytes)

70. RE: ULF: EbNaut over 3 wavelengths on ULF (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2017 01:35:37 -0500
Stefan and Paul, I think that a sferic spectrum of the sort that Paul made (including the well-considered details) is generally more accurate than an FDTD solution* for use in signal-strength predict
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-02/msg00046.html (21,936 bytes)

71. RE: ULF: 5 wavelengths on the 101 km band? Valid or not? (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 12:58:42 -0500
Congratulations and compliments Stefan, Paul and Renato, Markus and Wolf for enabling and providing what so far seems to be the only published experimental data for this poorly-understood part of the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-02/msg00102.html (11,356 bytes)

72. RE: ULF: 5 wavelengths on the 101 km band? Valid or not? (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 13:09:54 -0500
Paul, I'm guessing that your 3 sigma to 4 sigma estimate is based on a comparison of the 2970Hz pixels' amplitudes to surrounding pixels' amplitudes during the time that Stefan was transmitting; is t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-02/msg00103.html (12,396 bytes)

73. RE: LF: Raspberry Pi sound interface that works (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 18:45:39 -0500
Paul, Thanks for posting your findings on this topic. Plenty of the Audio Injector boards on local Amazon so I bought four in hopes that your tests would prove favorable. Thanks for the favorable res
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-02/msg00149.html (12,864 bytes)

74. RE: ULF: New carrier near 2970 Hz... (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 13:58:52 -0400
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00154.html (18,894 bytes)

75. RE: ULF: New carrier near 2970 Hz... (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:52:21 -0400
Geomagnetic K-index elevated March 21 through March 23, approximately 3 < Kp < 4 but higher in Europe with levels at Wingst and Niemegk varying by 50nT to 80nT at times during that period. Mentioning
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00185.html (15,244 bytes)

76. RE: ULF: New carrier near 2970 Hz... (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 03:25:42 -0400
Hello Stefan, I will save a copy of the http://www.webalice.it/rromero/live_cumiana/last-LFtest_2970.jpg trace, I think it is particularly valuable. The frequency spreading to which you called attent
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00195.html (19,753 bytes)

77. RE: ULF: New carrier near 2970 Hz... (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 03:42:18 -0400
Stefan, 73, Jim AA5BW Hi Jim, ULF, i wondered why the trace at IK1QFK in 5 wavelengths distance becaome so blurry in the recent days. See http://www.webalice.it/rromero/live_cumiana/last-LFtest_2970.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00196.html (17,166 bytes)

78. LF: RE: DK7FC in Todmorden at 2970 Hz (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 17:04:27 -0400
Paul, Does this meet the criterion that you were thinking of in your comments March 21st and March 22nd? 73, Jim AA5BW Stefan wrote (10th March): After coherently stacking 13:00 to 00:00 for 9 days i
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00202.html (11,797 bytes)

79. RE: LF: RE: DK7FC in Todmorden at 2970 Hz (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 17:52:12 -0400
Congratulations! Seems like more than a record. Seems historic. Hard to imagine a tougher frequency range than the neighborhood of 2970 Hz. 2970 Hz at 140 km, 303 km, 502 km and 881 km even defy mode
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00207.html (12,057 bytes)

80. RE: LF: DK7FC in Todmorden at 2970 Hz (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 17:53:39 -0400
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00208.html (14,352 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu