Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 275 ]

Total 275 documents matching your query.

181. Re: LF: TLAs - off topic (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 13:00:45 EDT
And why was SLOWCW corrupted into QRSS. Just to satisfy the TLA (or FLA) brigade? >> Just a minor nitpicky point of terminology, Andy, but if QRSS were a pure acronym that would be EFLA (Enhanced Fou
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-05/msg00142.html (8,481 bytes)

182. Re: LF: MMANA--plain text URL? (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 13:10:38 EDT
http://www.qsl.net/mmhamsoft/mmana/ Yes, that is correct, and it is the "official" site. (snip) There seems to be some confusion. The current English version is 0.72, but one can find versions numbe
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-06/msg00182.html (9,187 bytes)

183. Re: LF: MMANA--plain text URL? (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 13:06:54 EDT
Dick's message was in HTML with an embedded image. His Eudora formatted it correctly, the reflector passed it just fine >> That could very well be the case. AOL said there was an image, yet would no
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-06/msg00183.html (9,690 bytes)

184. Re: LF: Re: Re: TA report (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 14:57:08 EDT
<< Correction 0040 to 0134UTC Its that negative time stuff again! >> Perhaps some of us have the "arrow of time" stuck in us backwards, Peter. When I was reading Alberto's explanation the other day o
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-07/msg00095.html (7,947 bytes)

185. Re: LF: VO1NA TX The real explaination (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 18:34:44 EDT
Yes, one must be careful when dealing with those guys. Proving that your time device's registration is current in whatever epoch you may find yourself is not always a simple task. And if you have one
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-07/msg00156.html (8,440 bytes)

186. Re: LF: SAQ nil (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2003 13:25:31 EDT
So: is the system directional ? >> Not significantly. The whole array is less than a tenth of a wavelength long, so there is not enough phase delay to achieve much directionality. The design was mor
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-07/msg00174.html (8,893 bytes)

187. Re: LF: Beacon (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 13:23:11 EDT
<< I put out few 1/4Y radials, Yep some 550 meters in length each, but theyve done nothing/zilch to probably override the lossyness of this site to local flora and sometime fauna >> Unfortunately, ra
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-08/msg00080.html (8,279 bytes)

188. Re: LF: Re: Re: Radials (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 13:19:42 EDT
<< I'll just have to sail 3 miles offshore USA unless 136 licences become more readily available. >> I trust you'll be flying the Jolly Roger, then?
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-08/msg00081.html (8,033 bytes)

189. Re: LF: Stellar flares (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 19:22:42 EDT
Quite impressive amounts of energy are released from magnetars. We noted the 1998 event in the LWCA journal, The LOWDOWN. I can't place my hands on that number right now, but as I recall, we reported
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-09/msg00168.html (7,896 bytes)

190. Re: LF: Re: Re: SPAM !! (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 15:54:25 EDT
The return address I've used for this message is not subscribed to the list. It doesn't even exist-- Still, the fact remains that advertising messages below the SpamAssassin threshold do get through,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-10/msg00147.html (8,752 bytes)

191. Re: LF: Re: SPAM !! (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 14:32:26 EDT
The group is bound to get spam as its address is posted on quite a few web-sites (mine included) so that people know how to join and the robots harvest the address from those sites. Maybe a spam-filt
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-10/msg00148.html (8,742 bytes)

192. Re: LF: Start rsgb_lf_group? (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 14:09:35 EST
When in USA have permitted beacons 1w and a 15 meter antenna under FCC part 15 (160-190kHz)? This happened about 50 years ago, although I do not remember the precise year. John
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-11/msg00124.html (8,050 bytes)

193. Re: LF: Beacons stays on (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 22:45:47 EST
Excuse me, but it's not so bad here. No, not bad at all. I spent many happy years in that region as a youngster. It's just a bit of a change from Anchorage, for certain. There ARE mountains in the d
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-11/msg00125.html (9,269 bytes)

194. Re: LF: Beacons stays on (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 16:05:09 EST
it is confirmed that it and me/Sheri are being moved close to the SE Kansas/NE Oklahoma Border in January sometime. The relocation will remove you from all that fun with transpolar propagation, but a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-11/msg00126.html (9,009 bytes)

195. Re: LF: Unusual QRM (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 20:05:50 EST
Perhaps that should be QRaM ?
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-11/msg00127.html (7,327 bytes)

196. Re: LF: RE: Solar Activity (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 23:16:33 EST
But somewhat surprisingly, I had quite good M-to-O copy from VO1NA between about 0600 and some time after 0800 this morning. Excellent news. I am possibly a little more optimistic than Alan about a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-11/msg00128.html (7,627 bytes)

197. Re: LF: QH (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 12:28:10 EST
Anchorage -5F (who needs cryo preamp cooling?) Congratulations on the reception of ZL6QH! As for the cryo cooling, you do have us beat down here south of Atlanta--but not by nearly as much as I woul
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-12/msg00216.html (8,278 bytes)

198. Re: LF: XDW tripping in the snow (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 15:27:48 EST
We are due to return to Anchorage by midnite 24th Hmm. Someone with a keen interest in transpolar matters, planning a return to a cold, snowy place by midnight on the 24th. Wouldn't be to pick up a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-12/msg00217.html (8,329 bytes)

199. Re: LF: Test of bogus sender. (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 21:48:49 EST
If this message does _not_ get through... (etc) Oh dear. John D.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-12/msg00218.html (7,914 bytes)

200. Re: LF: Spam etc (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 20:55:10 EST
remember that anyone can write "Re:LF: " at the start of the subject to make it SEEM as if it came thro' the reflector. Yes, they certainly can. The text-only e-mail client I use with this account,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-12/msg00219.html (8,725 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu