| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: SAQ nil |
| From: | [email protected] |
| Date: | Sun, 6 Jul 2003 13:25:31 EDT |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | <[email protected]> |
In a message dated 7/6/03 11:31:26 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[email protected] writes:
So: is the system directional ? >> Not significantly. The whole array is less than a tenth of a wavelength long, so there is not enough phase delay to achieve much directionality. The design was more about loss reduction than anything else. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: SAQ nil, Alberto di Bene |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: Field strength calcs., Ian Kyle |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: SAQ nil, Dick Rollema |
| Next by Thread: | LF: Requium, SAQ et al., Ian Kyle |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |