Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 67 ]

Total 67 documents matching your query.

1. LF: daytime qso (score: 1)
Author: "MAL HAMILTON" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 1999 16:30:16 +0100
G3KEV worked OH3LYG daytime at 1117utc/241199. Report 559 each way. This report was down only one S point compared to a qso at 2107utc/211199 evening. 73 de Mal/G3KEV
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-11/msg00218.html (7,882 bytes)

2. LF: Re: Big/small antennas. (score: 1)
Author: "MAL HAMILTON" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 14:56:38 +0100
--Original Message-- From: Walter Blanchard <[email protected]> To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Date: 27 December 2000 14:17 Subject: LF: Big/small antennas. Hello gan
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00079.html (14,352 bytes)

3. LF: Re: Big/small antennas. (score: 1)
Author: "MAL HAMILTON" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 14:56:07 +0100
--Original Message-- From: Walter Blanchard <[email protected]> To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Date: 27 December 2000 14:17 Subject: LF: Big/small antennas. Hello gan
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00080.html (14,132 bytes)

4. LF: Re: re ZZ es ALM (score: 1)
Author: "MAL HAMILTON" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 18:16:19 +0100
Spoke with Jack agn tonight. He es MM0ALM have been trying for normal cw qso. Jack has heard MM0ALM but not well enough for contact . Glad Dave/MM0ALM is making it across to Jack. That is a good sig
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00103.html (9,428 bytes)

5. LF: Re: Re. VE1ZZ (score: 1)
Author: "MAL HAMILTON" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2000 18:17:49 +0100
He is wrong! Theory and experiment confirrm that 1W ERP is 1W ERP irrespective of the sise /height of the ant. (or anything else for that matter). You must know something about LF/MF antennas that t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00120.html (8,795 bytes)

6. LF: Re: Re. VE1ZZ (score: 1)
Author: "MAL HAMILTON" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2000 18:10:24 +0100
He is wrong! Theory and experiment confirrm that 1W ERP is 1W ERP irrespective of the sise /height of the ant. (or anything else for that matter). There is a difference. The big antenna lauches the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00121.html (8,836 bytes)

7. LF: Re: Guard circuit - impressive performance (score: 1)
Author: "MAL HAMILTON" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2000 18:09:23 +0100
Well ............. Just installed a version of the Decca guard circuit on the 600W PA, and its performance is seriously impressive ! Still using the cheap and nasty IRF840 FETs with just a minimum o
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00122.html (9,952 bytes)

8. LF: ve1zz (score: 1)
Author: "MAL HAMILTON" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2000 11:13:01 +0100
Merry Christmas to all experimenters on LF. Unfortunately I am otherwise engaged at present and cannot participate with the VE1ZZ experiments, but now that he is being heard in EU by several amateurs
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00134.html (9,613 bytes)

9. LF: Re: RE: other reports (score: 1)
Author: "MAL HAMILTON" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 18:29:22 +0100
Still the same power, but wet surroundings may make the antenna less efficient. The load R has risen so looks valid. The BPSK message is stored in PIC so won't change in the immediate future, I was
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00248.html (11,169 bytes)

10. LF: Insulators (score: 1)
Author: "MAL HAMILTON" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 18:21:24 +0100
If you live near a fishing port go to the port equipment shop and get some crab pot spinners. These are light weight polysterene devices, white in colour, shaped like a flat dog bone and very strong
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00249.html (8,056 bytes)

11. LF: Re: the old LF source book (score: 1)
Author: "MAL HAMILTON" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2000 11:38:48 +0100
Sounds like the LF source book of a couple of years ago. Most of the information was obsolete and bore no resemblence to the achievements taking place when it was published. I think 23 km was the re
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00290.html (10,714 bytes)

12. LF: Transistor (score: 1)
Author: "MAL HAMILTON" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 20:33:49 +0100
Hello. Thanks to all that supplied info about my transistor query. I had lots of replies direct and via the reflector. This info is much appreciated. 73 and agn tnx de Mal/G3KEV
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00348.html (8,024 bytes)

13. LF: VE acty (score: 1)
Author: "MAL HAMILTON" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 20:26:05 +0100
Hi All. Does anyone know if VE1ZZ is active or listening on 136. I have worked him numerous times on 160m and heard he was interested in LF but all has gone quiet lately. At times CFH is blowing my h
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00349.html (8,164 bytes)

14. Re: LF: Transistor (score: 1)
Author: "MAL HAMILTON" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 10:05:50 +0100
Hi Mal, My data tables show the 2N6674 to be an NPN silicon transistor, with the following params: Max reverse voltage: 300 I max 20 amps P 175 watts gain 8 - 20 at 10 amps working range up to 15 MH
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00355.html (8,993 bytes)

15. LF: Re: Re: Transistor (score: 1)
Author: "MAL HAMILTON" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 09:57:58 +0100
Towers transistor selector has it as: NPN, Si, TO3, 300V Vce, 15A max, 175W dis, Hfe of 8 at 10A, Ft of 15MHz. Made by RCA originally. Sounds a useful device. FETs are better though! 73. Dave G3YXM.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00356.html (9,151 bytes)

16. LF: amplifier design (score: 1)
Author: "MAL HAMILTON" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 11:09:06 +0100
Hello All The method of using an HF frequency, dividing down then using high power fets in class D or E then a LPF is not totally satisfactory and only permits cw mode. Keying this type of tx is also
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00377.html (8,926 bytes)

17. LF: Transistor (score: 1)
Author: "MAL HAMILTON" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2000 19:04:44 +0100
Hi all Does anyone know what a 2N6674 transistor happens to be? I have 4 of these devices out of a SMPS rated at 600w. These are Motorola. Your help appreciated de Mal/G3KEV
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00391.html (8,022 bytes)

18. LF: Re: SV: RE: Re:amplifiers (score: 1)
Author: "MAL HAMILTON" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2000 10:13:13 +0100
Andy and All The parasitic diode is no good in this configuration for catching the spikes from what I call the transient soak choke, I use separate clamp diodes up to the rails effectively 'crosing o
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00402.html (12,691 bytes)

19. LF: Re: Re: 73 khz permits (score: 1)
Author: "MAL HAMILTON" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2000 19:20:22 +0100
G3KEV wrote: the band was extended for a total of 3 years it was still the policy in spite of the fact that all the existing permits holders that were active were all south of Birmingham. For genuin
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00409.html (10,808 bytes)

20. LF: Re: Re: 73 khz permits (score: 1)
Author: "MAL HAMILTON" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2000 19:12:53 +0100
G3KEV wrote: the band was extended for a total of 3 years it was still the policy in spite of the fact that all the existing permits holders that were active were all south of Birmingham. For genuin
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00410.html (12,199 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu