Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 237 ]

Total 237 documents matching your query.

41. LF: Source for Litz wire at the Ham Radio ? (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 01:49:54 EDT
Dear LF group, for an active or passive RX loop antenna (G3LDO design or similar) I am looking for the "Litz" wire mentioned several times on this reflector. As far as I understood, it contains a num
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-06/msg00085.html (8,367 bytes)

42. LF: Re: Commercial TX for 136 (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 06:13:07 EDT
Hi Martin, Look at http://www.amrad.org/projects/lf/FirstRvw.html I don't know the "Ropex First" Transceiver myself, but I think its main disadvantage is the lack of a VFO. There have also been artic
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-06/msg00097.html (7,825 bytes)

43. LF: Test - don't read (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 14:28:58 EDT
Hello, reflector struck by lightning...? only one mail for the whole weekend.. 73 Wolf.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-06/msg00152.html (7,320 bytes)

44. LF: Spectrum Lab uploaded again (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 07:52:08 EDT
Hello group, As reported, the software archive was not complete. Something must have truncated the archive, though the FTP programme said "transfer completed". The correct file size of spectr_i.zip i
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-06/msg00164.html (8,568 bytes)

45. LF: Spectrum Lab - new functions (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 16:47:50 EDT
Hi Alan, Brian, Peter, and others playing with Spectrum Lab: I have just uploaded a slightly improved version of the program to its "main" site (not the 'beta' site, though it still has 'beta' status
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-06/msg00171.html (9,134 bytes)

46. LF: Re: Kenwood, Toriods (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:04:14 EDT
73's Wolf
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-06/msg00195.html (7,597 bytes)

47. LF: Info: LF Meeting at the Ham Radio, June 30th (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 12:57:25 EDT
Hello group, As in the past years, there will be a meeting of LF friends during the Ham Radio (hamfest in Friedrichshafen at the Bodensee, close to the HB9 and OE border). Thanks to Walter, DJ2LF, fo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-06/msg00293.html (8,247 bytes)

48. LF: Re^n: Receiver (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 12:59:58 EDT
Hello, I once had the chance to compare an old IC735, an IC706 and a TS850 running side-by-side connected to a tuned LF-antenna (150m long wire). Results: - TS850 with 500Hz and 270 Hz filter: Could
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-08/msg00017.html (9,363 bytes)

49. LF: Re: Dynamic range for FM link (was: Carriers) (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 13:32:53 EDT
Hi Larry, Rik, and the group, As Rik's wrote, the dynamic range of some cheap FM transmitters is possibly just in the range of 40dB or so. But IMO, a homemade "simple but true FM" transmitter could d
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-08/msg00033.html (9,435 bytes)

50. LF: Re: Re: Carriers, remote RX, antenna (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001 08:38:04 EDT
Hi Larry, Bob, and the group, Thanks Larry for the info about your remote RX. It is very helpful for me to hear someone else is using such a system with such good success. The main problem here is th
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-08/msg00049.html (10,358 bytes)

51. LF: Re: Carriers (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 07:06:32 EDT
Hi Mal and Alan, I can strongly confirm such QRM from modern TV sets. That also seems to be the reason why some days I "don't have ears" when operation from DF0WD. On a spectrogram, you can see the 5
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-08/msg00060.html (9,417 bytes)

52. LF: Deaf Rx ?? (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 14:19:40 EDT
Hi all, just look at http://oh2aq.kolumbus.com/dxs/137.html . Looks like Finbar is running real QRO now... 73 Wolf.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-09/msg00014.html (7,396 bytes)

53. LF: Russian ALPHA TX back "on air" - confirmed (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 13:14:37 EDT
Hello group, I can now confirm that some Russian ALPHA transmitters are back on air (someone must have paid the electricity bill - guess why ? ) A signal can be clearly seen and heard (with the softw
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-09/msg00044.html (7,967 bytes)

54. LF: ALPHA back on, plus CMEs & Aurora (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 16:25:20 EDT
Hello Group, I just received the Info from a VLF experimenter (not a radio amateur) that the ALPHA system seems to be back on. He observed signals on 11.905kHz and 12.649kHz. I have not verified this
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-09/msg00056.html (8,279 bytes)

55. LF: SAQ transmission - fb copy in DL (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 13:49:53 EDT
Hello group, Nice copy of the SAQ signal here in northwestern DL (loc JO42FD). I received the signal clean and easily readable with a very small antenna made of a bundle of ferrite rods, 400 turns of
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-09/msg00158.html (8,288 bytes)

56. Re: LF: Multi-layer loading coils (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 04:11:19 EST
Hello Ha-Jo and LF group, Exactly that's what I found in own experiments. By "forcing" the magnetic field through any kind of metal, you increase the losses. For the same reason, long coils shouldn't
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-10/msg00013.html (8,666 bytes)

57. LF: Re: Clowns on the OH2AQ DX cluster (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 07:52:47 EST
Hello Rik and the Group, I think the DX cluster entries on 136kHz are just stupid nonsens. If you check the PACKET DX cluster (use "sh/dx 137" on a CLX cluster), you don't see this junk. There have b
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-10/msg00031.html (7,701 bytes)

58. LF: Re: Re: dcf39/dk8kw (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2001 03:41:26 EDT
In a direct mail to Uwe I called it "non-coherent signal", but it meant exactly the same as Markus (DF6NM) explained here on the reflector a few hours later. I don't think there is any mysterious ve
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-10/msg00154.html (9,440 bytes)

59. LF: MB2HFC and weekend report (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2001 08:12:10 EDT
Hello group, I hard MB2HFC on saturday and sunday with good signal, but got no reply. I guess the 136kHz->144MHz transponder has the same problem as some AmSat's, suffering from very strong "inband"
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-10/msg00237.html (8,274 bytes)

60. LF: Very small indoor LF TX antenna .... .. (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 10:32:21 EDT
Hi group, I you want to see a phantastic miniature "LF TX antenna" with capacitive top loading at work, look at : http://www.qsl.net/dl4yhf/experim1.html Nothing serios at all, it's more an "ion spri
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-10/msg00280.html (8,178 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu