Many thanks for the spectrogram, Paul,
Tonite, if you run both of the grabber instances, the SNR may be a bit
better even.
OK, i run another session of DFCW-90 tonite. Same QRG.
73, Stefan
Am 15.11.2018 12:09, schrieb N1BUG:
Hi Stefan, LF
QSB was a factor last night. Isn't it always? I never had full
sequential call sign from DK7FC (missing only one 'dit') but I
consider the attached capture to be a full call sign copy.
Everything is clearly there, even if not sequential. Stefan, thanks
for the DFCW90 transmission! It is a pleasure to see this.
Today after some snow removal tasks I will work on optimizations to
the first of several SpecLab grabber instances (thanks Stefan).
Yesterday I had a successful full power test transmitting DFCW60.
Soon I will make an overnight appearance on DFCW. I don't know which
night(s) yet but I will announce it here.
73,
Paul
On 11/14/18 1:41 PM, DK7FC wrote:
All right Paul.
And i should move to 136.172 kHz again soon, my home-frequency of the
old days ;-) The US stns usually transmitted arround 137.775...137.782
kHz. So we 'far away' from each other inside the band. A few grabbers
are watching that small region since years, without much activity in the
last time. We splitted over to many bands and modes.
Good luck for your transmissions.
73, Stefan
Am 14.11.2018 18:00, schrieb N1BUG:
Hi Stefan,
Very good! I just moved the 'roaming grabber' back to your
frequency. There is QRM now because I am testing my own station on
DFCW at full power, but I will stop my transmitter before sunset.
73,
Paul
On 11/14/18 11:50 AM, DK7FC wrote:
Hi LF,
Tonite, there will be *DFCW-90* from my side. I'll stay at *137.620 Hz*.
Unusual, but you know, i'm currently bound to that frequency.
Starting at arround 21 UTC. Timing is not critical, which is unusual
too, these days :-)
73, Stefan
|
