Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: RE: 136kHz WSPR experiment

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: RE: 136kHz WSPR experiment
From: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 19:07:21 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1516818305; bh=XWxME9GKnTu9PxuMRV666UpNK1SML4jFedryKdqj5+k=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=ZMYKKM9v8qnAPBE7XW5NQZ+12DyYyDUK/k8nSsC7/S1LpRrAES7RDAIz152839Prj i7/8kKD9mWaDb04wNWhuZDAXLAA30veHsdvZudYr7kvY+3Myi145tvNv3KxtQRky09 ctEdyd+B2jdVQFnASLmWZJqKpqeAx64GpptYzSUJFLP8xwbBjJMTC/meETmCnQZF7I NyZF1s5XrnV2b1TFnu8NrQwYzf776jW+WzzPB7buX6VqCnhFXJ+Od+ooOh64tMvf12 zHDzTaaOMZ5jDIo46/sP+XXFOhXwkbWEyAnXzBUZ9kdss53n57bnAPFvph3D+6ZN49 CU3PCgluKB+xg==
In-reply-to: <CAHAQVWPYMZEHGzQ0aQX_rPKUUkDLuLk3T=x6WmqjA5uckCsGuQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHAQVWMs_556+qzyTJWOqDmgrPGzX62J2FfBH3ceRZ3fbfTfDg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAHAQVWPYMZEHGzQ0aQX_rPKUUkDLuLk3T=x6WmqjA5uckCsGuQ@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3


Am 24.01.2018 15:00, schrieb Roger Lapthorn:
To get best results I think you need LOW conductivity around the earth-electrode "antenna", so the signal spread (and hence effective loop area) is greatest. Placing near a river is likely to give poor results in my experience.
I agree.

Best would be a stony mountain sourrounded by a small lake rivulet. For example like here: http://k7fry.com/grid/?qth=JN49AK54QN&from=JN49AK64OK !!!! (Unfortunately the directivity of that earth antenna is almost orthogonal to the RX sites of Paul, DL0AO and DK7FC :-/ Ah and BTW it would be good to have a good Restaurant near that location, just to spend a few hours there while transmitting.
Sharing some of my thoughts... :-)

73, Stefan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>