Roger & All: I ran my FT-817 on 137
kHz stateside here to see how well it would work with my W1VD version of the
e-probe. Initially it was 10 to 15 dB down versus my high level LF
converter that uses a level 23 double balanced mixer and 2N5109
preamplifier
I found the FT-817 LF/MF performance improves very
nicely when using a low pass filter at LF/MF that has good pass band 50
ohm return loss ---like a Butterworth LPF with a 500 or 300 kHz
cutoff. About half way through the evening running the e-probe to LPF to
FT-817 on 2200m wspr2, I decided to build and add a broadband 2N3904 amplifier
stage. An extra 10 dB or so of net gain after my LPF for 137 kHz WSPR2 listening
made a large improvement. I had some +3000 km decodes from WH2XXP
overnight in the mid teens for SNR values, whereas I was having only WSPR2 limit
range decodes of WH2XXP without the added preamplifier gain. Initial
FT-817 settings were IPO "off", NB "off" AGC "off." After adding the
broadband 2N3904 preamp I had to run the input attenuator in the FT-817 and had
AGC set to fast with about a S3-S4 background level. It seems some gain is
needed to get through the RX front end in the FT-817, but using the attenuator
in the radio does not seem to hurt RX performance with about 20dB of total
preamp gain. Tonight I hope to add a variable bias resistor to fine tune the
preamplifier gain for best FT-817 performance.
I did try playing with the alignment menu
setting "01" for .5 to 2 MHz IF gain in the FT-817. Higher or lower
"01" settings did not make any difference in FT-817 receiver sensitivity at
LF/MF. But having a good 50 ohm Z match with an LPF to the FT-817
appears to be essential for good reception at 137 or 475 kHz....then adding the
preamplifier after the LPF makes up for the rx front end deficiencies. My
high level converter would still be my preference for performance, but the
e-probe>LPF>2N3904 preamp>FT-817 and attenuator worked reasonably well
here...
73 Mike wa3tts
FT-817 reception overnight on 2200m
band
2018-01-25 07:48 |
WH2XXP |
0.137507 |
-18 |
0 |
DM33 |
1 |
WA3TTS/2 |
EN90xn |
3014 |
65 |
2018-01-25 07:52 |
WH2XXP |
0.137507 |
-19 |
0 |
DM33 |
1 |
WA3TTS/2 |
EN90xn |
3014 |
65 |
2018-01-25 07:44 |
WH2XXP |
0.137507 |
-20 |
0 |
DM33 |
1 |
WA3TTS/2 |
EN90xn |
3014 |
65 |
2018-01-25 07:56 |
WH2XXP |
0.137507 |
-20 |
0 |
DM33 |
1 |
WA3TTS/2 |
EN90xn |
3014 |
65 |
2018-01-25 09:00 |
WH2XXP |
0.137507 |
-21 |
0 |
DM33 |
1 |
WA3TTS/2 |
EN90xn |
3014 |
65 |
2018-01-25 08:56 |
WH2XXP |
0.137507 |
-22 |
0 |
DM33 |
1 |
WA3TTS/2 |
EN90xn |
3014 |
65 |
2018-01-25 06:36 |
WH2XXP |
0.137507 |
-30 |
0 |
DM33 |
1 |
WA3TTS/2 |
EN90xn |
3014 |
65 |
2018-01-25 11:04 |
WH2XXP |
0.137507 |
-31 |
0 |
DM33 |
1 |
WA3TTS/2 |
EN90xn |
3014 |
65 |
2018-01-25 10:08 |
WH2XXP |
0.137507 |
-31 |
0 |
DM33 |
1 |
WA3TTS/2 |
EN90xn |
3014 |
65 |
2018-01-25 11:56 |
WH2XXP |
0.137507 |
-31 |
0 |
DM33 |
1 |
WA3TTS/2 |
EN90xn |
3014 |
65 |
2018-01-25 06:24 |
WH2XXP |
0.137507 |
-31 |
0 |
DM33 |
1 |
WA3TTS/2 |
EN90xn |
3014 |
65 |
2018-01-25 12:20 |
WH2XXP |
0.137507 |
-31 |
0 |
DM33 |
1 |
WA3TTS/2 |
EN90xn |
3014 |
65 |
2018-01-25 05:52 |
WH2XXP |
0.137507 |
-31 |
0 |
DM33 |
1 |
WA3TTS/2 |
EN90xn |
3014 |
65 |
2018-01-25 10:28 |
WH2XXP |
0.137507 |
-32 |
0 |
DM33 |
1 |
WA3TTS/2 |
EN90xn |
3014 |
65 |
2018-01-25 05:56 |
WH2XXP |
0.137507 |
-32 |
0 |
DM33 |
1 |
WA3TTS/2 |
EN90xn |
3014 |
65 |
2018-01-25 12:36 |
WH2XXP |
0.137507 |
-33 |
0 |
DM33 |
1 |
WA3TTS/2 |
EN90xn |
3014 |
65 |
2018-01-25 04:44 |
WH2XXP |
0.137507 |
-33 |
0 |
DM33 |
1 |
WA3TTS/2 |
EN90xn |
3014 |
65 |
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2018 4:21
AM
Subject: LF: Re: 136kHz WSPR
experiment
Sorry about the spurious "," .
|