Hi Paul,
>I already have plans to build the big T type LPF.
Out of curiosity I've done some spice simulations of your PA.
They indicate that a T type LPF won't help at all.
This was to be expected because your PA is not a class D voltage mode
push pull PA like W1VD's or IK1HSS's or 2E0ILY 's.
Indeed the T type LPF will cause considerably higher voltage spikes at the
FET'S drain.
In the attached screenshot you can see three simulations,each with a different
output filter.
A shunt C LPF,a series L LPF and even a diplexer filter.
The red traces represent voltage at the drain,green is DS current.
With the diplexer voltage spikes are lowest.
But I obviously the filter is not your problem.
It seems that the near field of the antenna is causing the trouble.
I would suggest to try a second isolation transformer or a good
common mode choke *at the shack* end of your coax run instead of building a
T-type LPF.
P.S. Has your Ultimate 3S a LPF installed before you feed it into the PA?
73
Clemens
DL4RAJ
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [email protected]
>[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of N1BUG
>Sent: Monday, December 25, 2017 1:15 PM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: R: Re: LF: TXing 2200m WSPR
>
>Hi Marco,
>
>I don't detect any heat in the LPF but at this low power level it
>could be difficult to detect it.
>
>I already have plans to build the big T type LPF. I have the
>T-225A-2 cores and metal to make a compartmented box. Capacitors are
>on the way, could arrive around 29 December. I still need to order
>the wire and some kind of material for mounting the big inductors.
>
>I'm making that LPF because eventually I will also build the big
>amplifier. I'm not sure when that will happen, probably a bit late
>for this LF season.
>
>The most curious thing is what seems to be some measurement error or
>impedance transformation but the cause remains elusive. I hope to
>find the reason so I can be more confident about measurements when I
>go go high power.
>
>73,
>Paul N1BUG
>
>
>On 12/25/2017 04:35 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>> Hello everybody,
>>
>> it's ever interesting to read that somebody else has some troubles as
>> experienced from myself ;-)
>> Me too am grateful to Andy for the support I received
>> while struggling with odd experiences..
>> Let me join the discussion and share a possible solution: I see that
>> LPF is a PI version, similar to what I used in the past. It
>was nice in
>> RL, armonic suppression and losses when tested with low power
>> instruments, than I was increasing the wire diameter of coils because
>> it was a... warming thing! The current was indeed very high
>in the FETs
>> (2+2 FETs in push pull) and the RIP area was growing...
>> After I tried the T LPF (see attachment) no more problems, no more
>> warming boxes..
>> You could re-arrange your LPF components for a quick trial and save
>> some caps ;-)
>> In my version I had to make some change because the cores were not
>> available and used T200-A2 cores calculating the turns to get 59 and
>> 109 uH coils.
>>
>> Maybe it's worth to try ;-)
>>
>> CU on 137kHz
>>
>> Marco, IK1HSS
>
>
>---
>Diese E-Mail wurde von AVG auf Viren geprüft.
>http://www.avg.com
>
1237kHz-PA.png
Description: PNG image
|
