To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: VLF: First VLF detection DL > EA |
From: | <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 7 Dec 2017 12:13:04 -0500 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20161114; t=1512666796; bh=SIn7jIVQXgi38GrivUoEZ+wRMsGXsO3ZryP3TD3ZxFA=; h=Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=YVTj8Tn3/Dp4xSHv0EInIVpk/i4JH/eWWUrFIPWchq9Lu6EBwP6nvMSlgkWMkYMyg 5b/5jpAucbHJYh0fnOX5QOgFBO1IfZ2d0h5S8hVEaot1uSKyfhzaS3EUBpJZtCrjr9 2BgqkUjctQG8GlkCgQ3t2xTABbfmny23HZbSwjczFnGoK1YHlljLjqoIZEdXeTXrUN Cwou+EXu5TJLXF4sCKtgCk9NncSuzQwmSe7jhAlNzsvzp/of1TZhi7sGvbd+DJzLDJ yskv9m+PrNE5x/PLsFkN/UJo3+L7ic1021WIjNI2JSpHeNduSVAhyKBu4OwsHd0SQ5 Pi7j+DvxETOYQ== |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CANA3B6VmLfG7AA692ajKxa6+swztKOmi-YcattQQOi_mMPzitA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CANA3B6X8GZOzduMGcppmDHdTDQ6R5Pq6GHSUuRuuRASe9WbA7Q@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAEduzkpDMw-kvmbU9q4DMhtzeQJdQd=5D0Xqa73auHaVGpH-8A@mail.gmail.com> <CAL4b5hBWRNbMSm7P2H6BTDTa3qPEiHNgF16R9o3A-X9ggAV6uw@mail.gmail.com> <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB9AAB0EB9@servigilant.vigilant.local> <[email protected]> <CANA3B6UU_AWP3S4K0XT4yju_ZKi+DM3Z8LYAOu0_KrHXR_W9aA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CANA3B6VSci3YUufSQ73iV2jFAg-i46zLzr9dxNeGwabCkL9Xzw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Thread-index: | AQMcfBPTxY+k5qd6rWysCs3Lx7yy3QG5vOvIAm1P1iUB1iCD1gJFU3f2AewoaLwCwMK/KQLehgd4AbZlmh8CXxTHIAHbOkn1AkLV1KkCfr7LPQE2oLaxApYxE+6fs5ZBoA== |
Based on Marcus' request for all-day carrier at 17470.1000 Hz and Paul's report of -38.55 dB in 1Hz in Forest, Virginia, I'll keep a SpecLab window open at 17470.1000. I installed a receiver with GPSDO at a new lower-noise* permanent location in Arlington, VA two days ago but it did not occur to me that the new lower noise level might accommodate detection of Stefan's 17470.1000 Hz signal. * (15 dB lower noise so far, additional reduction likely this week) -38.55 dB in 1Hz would seem to suggest 6 dB in 8 hours using EbNaut, but I haven't tried EbNaut and wonder (if the new lower-noise Arlington location has noise and path loss similar to that of Forest, VA) how much lower than 6 dB the SNR would be with an all-day carrier (instead of with EbNaut). Does it seem worthwhile to perform 8-hour integrations for (and save raw data for) Stefan's 17470.1000 Hz carrier signals in the new Arlington, VA location? Any other suggestions for near-term detection of Stefan's 17470.1000 Hz carrier signals in Arlington, VA? If EbNaut is strongly suggested, is Windows OS incompatible? Long learning curve for an EbNaut newcomer? 73, Jim AA5BW -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Paul Nicholson Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2017 4:49 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: VLF: First VLF detection DL > EA > How far could this signal travel! We are missing > RX stations everywhere! Forest, Virginia, is reporting Eb/N0 = -7.5dB on the 4 char transmission. That's -38.55 dB in 1Hz. Distance is 6817 km. Recommend starting a bit later, say 00:00 or 01:00, and maybe we do some stacking too? -- Paul Nicholson -- |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: VLF: TA east to west?, Paul Nicholson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: VLF: TA east to west?, hvanesce |
Previous by Thread: | Re: VLF: TA east to west?, Markus Vester |
Next by Thread: | Re: VLF: First VLF detection DL > EA, Markus Vester |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |