Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: VLF: First VLF detection DL > EA

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: VLF: First VLF detection DL > EA
From: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2017 15:43:07 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1512225788; bh=PmA6f5LY/BW8IAM3SAt0m0koMc3BuNvJgwGgWbPUytc=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=Hnc9VlA7S6/kx3He8iUp89GOuRDDtALueYYskihRIDGl7IQBOBBLnuWtvZwZCqc8m BvGDbUW/tMV4kTLRnQ8TatuLovDDwyQRlREKy+JHJBqzGQVnq5ezbnWnWbyTAl9o7x bTIjICR2dGO3MCb814vXCN1q+14AXtCc06/l5x9hRiD8CPKYz4WtUWj85Hv3FpSsY9 PftMsiPMwazEICwX8U84612PprGJWE7mwmCJ0Tg2PflvqLhaBDctulahC3AlKoZTAw xzdrKqwTZWDNhAxdy2KxS/lRebxlPw6tWr9+8bdeBN8JduyWrUoR1+UxYHNe+CSVqm mRjvDUS2Wjlfg==
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CANA3B6VmLfG7AA692ajKxa6+swztKOmi-YcattQQOi_mMPzitA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CANA3B6X8GZOzduMGcppmDHdTDQ6R5Pq6GHSUuRuuRASe9WbA7Q@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
Hello Max,

Nice, thanks for the capture and congrats to the reception.
Soon we may try a short EbNaut message, so there is a chance for you...

73, Stefan


Am 02.12.2017 13:23, schrieb Max IK0VVE:
Congrats dear friends!!

Attached here the update from 424 uHz grabber. Restarted the 47 uHz... problem again here. If possible I'll create an online grabber. The new PC is not configured for web download at the moment. 


______________________________

 
...here some of my HAM Radio projects...



Cc:
Data: Sat, 02 Dec 2017 09:57:48 +0100
Oggetto: VLF: First VLF detection DL > EA

Hello VLF friends,
 
This morning i looked on the EA5DOM VLF grabber and saw much better
traces of the carrier on 17.4701 kHz.
 
I find this is a valid one-way contact or carrier detection and i think
it is the first time that this was done by amateurs between DL and EA.
 
It looks like there is some QSB on that path, higher than observed a
similar distance at 8270 Hz.
We can now think about improvements and about a first message attempt...
 
73, Stefan
 
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>