Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: VLF: EbNaut tonite

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: VLF: EbNaut tonite
From: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 12:49:45 +0200
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]cal> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv: Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3

Am 29.05.2017 20:02, schrieb Paul Nicholson:
I also tried the amplitude and power normalisation
trick but that didn't improve the result either.
I thought a bit about noise cancelling techniques. You recently said
that you are using different filter/blanker settings for daytime and
nighttime signals.
Since you are programming all the software you are using (ufb!, i wish i
could do it too :-) ), would it be useful to determine the optimal
filter/blanker settings from the signal appearing during the analysis? I
mean, can you analyse e.g. QRN bursts (time domain, checking rise time,
and peak above average) and then apply an optimal, individual filter
which already includes the idea of the power normalisation trick? :-)
73, Stefan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>