To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: NA VLF |
From: | [email protected] |
Date: | Tue, 16 May 2017 17:11:46 -0230 (NDT) |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB8FDD9B58@servigilant.vigilant.local> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
On Tue, 16 May 2017, Paul Nicholson wrote: I hope the improvements were not to reduce the erp... OK let's try a carrier tonight. NTP and the raspi clock are working well. A new helix will be wound when the wire arrives and I'm building up the courage climb up and replace the hardware for the the big RL. We will succeed! 73 Joe |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: NA VLF, jcraig |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: 136 op32 last 24H, Graham |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: NA VLF, Paul Nicholson |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: NA VLF, Paul Nicholson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |