To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: NA VLF |
From: | Paul Nicholson <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 16 May 2017 17:32:15 +0000 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=abelian.org ; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Nb3DrdOqxfOQC0C7C+ph22DouOkBh+zrxK0YaE5O9Hk=; b=Guk8zCzs7n5oAKUMgUM0pwlMF3 /RTI9NhYA7SAMnJTvFfXAmO2Zgh50zxINWm7QMQV/1ZyiH2o4SQKkfLZ+ecAZutMPeWR4y3+51JpJ NnsoS3N+Xc3sirwo6dbsriuvKPzA+IPEVl1ThiDC23+ty15/inzrFTYbVeT53e0SzPkc=; |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB8FDD9B58@servigilant.vigilant.local> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 |
The noise was low last night, almost as quiet as 7th/8th but still the message doesn't decode. It should be an easy decode at +1dB or so, especially with the improvements you've made. The strongest 'decode' I get is ' OC' at +0.6 dB. I begin to think that something must be wrong. You've got ebnaut -et -N3 -p8K25A | sudo ./ebkey -S55 -m rp,gpio=23 -T '20170513 2300' -vv which matches the decoder setup. Can you confirm the time is correct on the RPi? It needs to be within a couple of seconds of UT. Check that ntpd is working using the command ntpq -p If all looks OK, I think we should switch back to carrier so that I can take some more measurements. -- Paul Nicholson -- |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: RE: Combining LF amps revisited, Chris Wilson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | R: Re: R: Re: LF: RE: Combining LF amps revisited, [email protected] |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: NA VLF, James Plesa |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: NA VLF, jcraig |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |