To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: NA VLF |
From: | Paul Nicholson <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 9 May 2017 10:26:45 +0000 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=abelian.org ; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=usdnqmHbu6+EUEFPtPPXzff75tM4F+YIqxMBZo8k0T4=; b=3HDKv/qKjEcn1DwLRKqSh2Z8ot T3ExjA+jz3KAJ0vJG4045TS67sFD39i1Rm6mxuHItN5DwiS610Ufv6vTzMpSLzP+br++y08K6+0tB Ufh+tw3wCPPu9ONxZie0OP7nWkY+PP8J8Yeg/1aAdpNyLg4EHzpnlw/r1ZOYjmrMTlDE=; |
In-reply-to: | <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB8FDD9B58@servigilant.vigilant.local> |
References: | <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB8FDD9B58@servigilant.vigilant.local> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 |
I can't detect any signal from Joe last night 8th/9th 22:00 to 04:00, not a trace - perhaps the tx has gone off. After sweeping for optimum settings, I couldn't get much improvement. Daytime reception, S/N = 13.5 dB in 23.148 uHz: http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/170509a.png Some of the energy is in adjacent bins on this 12 hour integration, the frequency probably drifted a little, losing a dB or so. Nighttime, S/N = 14.3 dB in 46.296 uHz: http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/170509b.png Tried an EbNaut 'decode' of the 6 hour nighttime signal. Unmodulated carrier is a valid message which decodes to a string of '*' characters. Because of the linearity of the coding, the performance is representative of any other message with the same settings. 4 chars 16K25A CRC=12 Symbols = 22 seconds, duration 05:52:00 gives rank 946 ber 42.2% '****' carrier Eb/N0: -0.1 dB carrier S/N: 13.53 dB in 47.3 uHz, -29.72 dB in 1Hz, -63.70 dB in 2.5kHz The snag is, this 'decode' is only possible because I could see the signal and measure its frequency. A real EbNaut message is invisible and if the frequency is out by more than about 5uHz it will not decode. 5 chars should just be possible but I could not get it to decode. -- Paul Nicholson -- |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: Re: LF: NA VLF, VIGILANT Luis Fernández |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: NA VLF, jcraig |
Previous by Thread: | RE: Re: LF: NA VLF, VIGILANT Luis Fernández |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: NA VLF, jcraig |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |