To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: NA VLF |
From: | Markus Vester <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 23 May 2017 12:28:49 -0400 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20150623; t=1495556930; bh=nszcj3YkM9d4uWul2pW1P1YNgIHxkGF7agOd6YD2NBA=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=jkyP6H8Ym/Qc8Y8lHfEnYxxWHW6c7vbSD9UCFT4y3dO+KcGDI0SkQiQU8b+eWgoT9 onsAezqyoX/fan4dou3m4OW6nyhaNTOfK+Cha1xcVcQcYLeRSka8Y5uafrsA0Hb90q Ff8Xoct/yHvDxehGhtFvfbtWOT1NeIyQYfPjPCUQ= |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
D'oh, pity! That message sounded so plausible, and at 0.5 dB EbN0 I wasn't suspecting a false decode. Paul and Markus,Joe, could you perhaps remind me of your EbNaut timing parameters again? I seem to have missed an email mentioning them. I don't think that mutual QRM would have been much of a problem. The two signals would be perfectly orthogonal if you used identical symbol timing and chose a carrier frequency spacing which is a multiple of the inverse symbol period (i.e. 0.05 or 0.1 Hz for Stefan's 20 s symbols). Best 73, Markus -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- Von: jcraig <[email protected]> An: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]> Verschickt: Di, 23. Mai 2017 17:12 Betreff: Re: LF: NA VLF Thank-you for the encouragement and patience, but infortunately the message received does not match the one that was sent, assuminmg the sending was done correctly. Can we try again? Hopefully I am not causing QRM to Stefan's QTC on 8270.1 Hz. If so I can QSY back to 8277 Hz! Can we try his suggestion for a daytime attempt to take advantage of the lower QRN or will the S/N be too low? Also, are the sigs stable enough? Stefan suggested a GPS module that could be used with Spec Lab to generate a disciplined carrier. The WX should be more stable now. Last night the ERP decreased and the phase probably shifted too. 73 Joe VO1NA On Tue, 23 May 2017, Markus Vester wrote: > Paul and Joe, > > great news! Your patience has finally paid off. Congratulations to both on this excellent piece of work! > > 73, > Markus (DF6NM) > > -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- > Von: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]> > An: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]> > Verschickt: Di, 23. Mai 2017 12:07 > Betreff: Re: LF: NA VLF > > > > Overnight 22nd/23rd was fairly quiet and the decoder turned up > > 'VO!' > > at Eb/N0 = +0.5dB, BER 42.7% with constant reference phase, > peaking at frequency of 8270.0070925 Hz + 6 uHz. > > Rank 7430 in the decoder list. > Carrier S/N: 12.81 dB in 39.2 uHz, > -31.26 dB in 1Hz, > -65.24 dB in 2.5kHz > > -- > Paul Nicholson > -- |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: NA VLF, DK7FC |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: VLF: EbNaut tonite, DK7FC |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: NA VLF, DK7FC |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: NA VLF, Paul Nicholson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |