There should be a "Nicholson limit" for how well something of a
certain complexity can be explained using a given number of words
with a high probability of being understood correctly. Your paper is
about as good as it could ever get. Thanks Paul.
Bill VE2IQ
At 02:35 AM 12/26/2016, Paul wrote:
I wrote a non-mathematical introductory article about how
forward error correction works.
There's a lot of material on the web about FEC but most
of it is very technical and tends to concentrate on one or
another particular coding scheme. I couldn't find anything
that demonstrates and really explains in simple terms the
essential principle of it.
So I thought I'd try to write something, perhaps to see if
I can understand it myself.
The article should appeal to anyone who's wondered how 'coding'
a message, which increases its bandwidth and reduces its S/N,
can actually lead to greatly improved communications.
http://abelian.org/fec/pn161218/
or in pdf format
http://abelian.org/fec/pn161218.pdf
Whether I've succeeded or not, the reader will have to judge.
--
Paul Nicholson
--
|
