Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: ULF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests

To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: ULF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests
From: DK7FC <selberdenken@posteo.de>
Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 11:42:23 +0200
In-reply-to: <57283874.6080406@abelian.org>
References: <1545cc43544-7b51-40b@webprd-a09.mail.aol.com> <57222E30.1080202@posteo.de> <57225653.3090907@abelian.org> <5725FCD5.40606@posteo.de> <57260D6A.3040503@abelian.org> <572613AC.90704@posteo.de> <57261C33.6010603@posteo.de> <57283874.6080406@abelian.org>
Reply-to: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
That's perfect Paul! Thanks for the decode. The error map is astonishing clean! So 200s symbols to 30s symbols that's 8 dB and without the 6 dB QRP, here we are: 14 dB :-)
Still some things to prepare for next tests. Need to finish the usage of 
'Oskar' now, because it wil be much easier to add the remaining 2 
yoghurt cups on the coil to get more L.
I thought about the old times and the 46 km band. Not only i have been 
on 6.47 kHz these days, if i remember correctly it was DF6NM and OE5ODL 
as well. I would like to come back to that band for some tests. Maybe we 
can see a first tendency of advantages / disadvantages.
73, Stefan

Am 03.05.2016 07:34, schrieb Paul Nicholson:
Stefan wrote:

> 130 mA
> f = 8270.1 Hz
> Start time: 01.05.2016   15:00:02 UTC
> Period: 200 s
> Length: 5
> CRC 16
> Coding 8K19A

Copied 'VLFDX'

Reference phase: constant
Eb/N0: +5.4 dB
BER: 26.8 %
Carrier: S/N: 19.77 dB in 9.8 uHz
Error map: http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/160502a.gif

I am seeing the expected 6dB signal reduction
at the lower antenna current.

--
Paul Nicholson
--






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>