Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | Andy Talbot <[email protected]> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re[6]: LF: Zmag of 45.6 Ohms OK, or should I try for better? |
| From: | Chris Wilson <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Mon, 2 Nov 2015 14:50:01 +0000 |
| In-reply-to: | <CAA8k23RiNqVR=prKdN6CPEfFZTiwBWOOjBTT4qryEX_xfPC7iQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| Organization: | Gatesgarth Developments |
| References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAA8k23RPmHS1tb+H3=J0ZB0w-HEEY_deo5RSOy+dvVuwsFWN9A@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAA8k23RiNqVR=prKdN6CPEfFZTiwBWOOjBTT4qryEX_xfPC7iQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
Hello Andy, Monday, November 2, 2015 OK, many thanks Andy, I reckon it should be ok for my purposes then, I'll wind one when I get an hour, much appreciated. > Ae is specified as 211mm^2 for that size core, > So, at 137kHz Mike's 16 turns with a Bmax of 0.1Tesla means : > V = 4.44.F.N.A.B = 205 Vrms > In a 50 ohm system this equates to 840 Watts > Andy G4JNT -- Best regards, Chris mailto:[email protected] |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Re[4]: LF: Zmag of 45.6 Ohms OK, or should I try for better?, Andy Talbot |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: Quiet, small and economical to run grabber PC's?, Chris Wilson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Re[4]: LF: Zmag of 45.6 Ohms OK, or should I try for better?, Andy Talbot |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Re[2]: LF: Zmag of 45.6 Ohms OK, or should I try for better?, Mike Dennison |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |