To: | Andy Talbot <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re[4]: LF: Zmag of 45.6 Ohms OK, or should I try for better? |
From: | Chris Wilson <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 2 Nov 2015 16:55:13 +0000 |
In-reply-to: | <CAA8k23SRrpFH1ZD5gccgWBRz7-TxNP4CKNqQcwA9vHVLs5fcmA@mail.gmail.com> |
Organization: | Gatesgarth Developments |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAA8k23SXAfHfAe5H3DmgiUGFn8-w84SLuUOiTELbSzdbpV8L1g@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAA8k23SRrpFH1ZD5gccgWBRz7-TxNP4CKNqQcwA9vHVLs5fcmA@mail.gmail.com> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hello Andy, Monday, November 2, 2015 These cores of mine are of course halves of a whole, there's a plastic bobbin and a stainless clip arrangement that clamps two of the ones in my link together to form a closed core. Just for clarity. When I bought them I initially bought just one, thinking that was it... > Ae = 152mm^2 > So a bit smaller than Chris's ETD49 core. > Andy -- Best regards, Chris mailto:[email protected] |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Re[2]: LF: Zmag of 45.6 Ohms OK, or should I try for better?, Andy Talbot |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: FR5ZX yesterday no results, DK7FC |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Re[2]: LF: Zmag of 45.6 Ohms OK, or should I try for better?, Andy Talbot |
Next by Thread: | Re[4]: LF: Zmag of 45.6 Ohms OK, or should I try for better?, Chris Wilson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |