Re: Re[2]: LF: Zmag of 45.6 Ohms OK, or should I try for better?

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	Re: Re[2]: LF: Zmag of 45.6 Ohms OK, or should I try for better?
From:	"Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date:	Mon, 02 Nov 2015 15:58:29 -0000
In-reply-to:	<CAA8k23TxUKZ700AHSjWg0CTRqQPA6C=zWYKG15WTi0r0Gc7KVA@mail.gmail.com>
References:	<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <CAA8k23TxUKZ700AHSjWg0CTRqQPA6C=zWYKG15WTi0r0Gc7KVA@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

> That is not the core diameter - if it were it would be an ENORMOUS
> core.
>
> > Well, I specified the core type as Chris was originally using a
> > different type, but of course the size is relevant. The diameter is
> > 55mm and I use two cores, one on top of the other, to reduce heat.

55mm is the OD. Did you need the ID?

Mike
====

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Re[2]: LF: Zmag of 45.6 Ohms OK, or should I try for better?, Mike Dennison Re[4]: LF: Zmag of 45.6 Ohms OK, or should I try for better?, Chris Wilson Re: Re[2]: LF: Zmag of 45.6 Ohms OK, or should I try for better?, Andy Talbot Re[4]: LF: Zmag of 45.6 Ohms OK, or should I try for better?, Chris Wilson Re: Re[4]: LF: Zmag of 45.6 Ohms OK, or should I try for better?, Andy Talbot Re[6]: LF: Zmag of 45.6 Ohms OK, or should I try for better?, Chris Wilson Re: Re[2]: LF: Zmag of 45.6 Ohms OK, or should I try for better?, Mike Dennison Re: Re[2]: LF: Zmag of 45.6 Ohms OK, or should I try for better?, Andy Talbot Re: Re[2]: LF: Zmag of 45.6 Ohms OK, or should I try for better?, Mike Dennison <= Re: Re[2]: LF: Zmag of 45.6 Ohms OK, or should I try for better?, Andy Talbot Re: Re[2]: LF: Zmag of 45.6 Ohms OK, or should I try for better?, Mike Dennison Re: Re[2]: LF: Zmag of 45.6 Ohms OK, or should I try for better?, Andy Talbot Re[4]: LF: Zmag of 45.6 Ohms OK, or should I try for better?, Chris Wilson Re[4]: LF: Zmag of 45.6 Ohms OK, or should I try for better?, Chris Wilson

Previous by Date:	LF: VO1NA traces nr Moscow, Alex K
Next by Date:	Re: Re[2]: LF: Zmag of 45.6 Ohms OK, or should I try for better?, Andy Talbot
Previous by Thread:	Re: Re[2]: LF: Zmag of 45.6 Ohms OK, or should I try for better?, Andy Talbot
Next by Thread:	Re: Re[2]: LF: Zmag of 45.6 Ohms OK, or should I try for better?, Andy Talbot
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]