To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Re[2]: LF: Zmag of 45.6 Ohms OK, or should I try for better? |
From: | "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 02 Nov 2015 15:58:29 -0000 |
In-reply-to: | <CAA8k23TxUKZ700AHSjWg0CTRqQPA6C=zWYKG15WTi0r0Gc7KVA@mail.gmail.com> |
References: | <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <CAA8k23TxUKZ700AHSjWg0CTRqQPA6C=zWYKG15WTi0r0Gc7KVA@mail.gmail.com> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
> That is not the core diameter - if it were it would be an ENORMOUS > core. > > > Well, I specified the core type as Chris was originally using a > > different type, but of course the size is relevant. The diameter is > > 55mm and I use two cores, one on top of the other, to reduce heat. 55mm is the OD. Did you need the ID? Mike ==== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: VO1NA traces nr Moscow, Alex K |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Re[2]: LF: Zmag of 45.6 Ohms OK, or should I try for better?, Andy Talbot |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Re[2]: LF: Zmag of 45.6 Ohms OK, or should I try for better?, Andy Talbot |
Next by Thread: | Re: Re[2]: LF: Zmag of 45.6 Ohms OK, or should I try for better?, Andy Talbot |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |