Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: WSPR-X

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: WSPR-X
From: Martin Evans <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 21:11:08 +0100
In-reply-to: <996C21CA85D54CCA8FAACBD2C33B4F72@White>
References: <[email protected]> <CAJW4BFkTFkXW6e1oUfTFT8O0VjRWs8ZUw=bV2cteOBLx5vZ8Yg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <996C21CA85D54CCA8FAACBD2C33B4F72@White>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
Ah - thanks Marcus.

This gives me somewhere to start looking!

Martin  GW3UCJ.

################
Hi Martin, 
 
version r3058 is working fine here. The issue could perhaps be related to samplerate deviation. WSPR v2.11 sets up the soundcard at 48000 samples/second whereas WSPR-X is asking for 12000 s/s. Usually the ratio between the delivered samplerates is an accurate factor of four, but it depends on the soundcard driver. More than half a percent error will upset the symbol timing enough to render decoding impossible. You could check it by injecting a known audio tone and looking at the frequency in the wspr-x spectrogram.
 
Best 73,
Markus (DF6NM)
 
 

Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2015 8:30 PM
Subject: LF: WSPR-X


I've tried and tried to get WSPR-X V0.8 r3058  to decode - I'm trying
now, on 474.2kHz.

Good strong signals on the waterfall, computer time synched using
Dimension 4, but absolutely no joy at decoding.

Is there a secret to this - the older WSPR 2.0 works fine.

Or is there a later version that actually works?

Martin  GW3UCJ  Swansea.




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>