Re: LF: Eb/N0 values for amateur modes

[Paul Nicholson <vlf0403@abelian.org>]

Markus wrote:

> Thanks for this Pieter!

I second that.  Very informative and I haven't seen this
information collated anywhere else.  Definitely one to
save.

CW by ear scores better than I would have guessed.  Being a
Morse code enthusiast I'm happy to see that.

CRC and synchronising bits shouldn't be counted as payload
information so some of the table entries need higher Eb/N0.

The table shows the cost you have to pay (in Eb/N0 terms)
to make a digital mode robust with respect to drift, fading,
interference, and have ease of use and a limited bandwidth.

--
Paul Nicholson
http://abelian.org/
--