Re: LF: Re: MF OPERA BAD

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	Re: LF: Re: MF OPERA BAD
From:	wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>
Date:	Fri, 09 Jan 2015 21:14:05 +0100
In-reply-to:	<3CF7ED70B4C647CE9E6F787017210E61@AGB>
References:	<8D0AB94E45714E0685D511622E097CCD@malHP> <[email protected]> <A4F3A54697004C1EBB910DF9E0AB0EC2@KA9CFD> <3CF7ED70B4C647CE9E6F787017210E61@AGB>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]
User-agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7

Am 09.01.2015 21:00, schrieb Graham:

True  just  like  wspr   :)


With the big difference that WSPR creates FAR LESS false decodes.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: MF OPERA BAD, mal hamilton Re: LF: MF OPERA BAD, DK7FC LF: Re: MF OPERA BAD, Jay Hainline Re: LF: Re: MF OPERA BAD, Graham Re: LF: Re: MF OPERA BAD, wolf_dl4yhf <= Re: LF: Re: MF OPERA BAD, Graham Re: LF: MF OPERA BAD, Graham Re: LF: MF OPERA BAD, Michel Brunel Re: LF: MF OPERA BAD, Graham Re: LF: MF OPERA BAD, Markus Vester Re: LF: MF OPERA BAD, Graham Re: LF: MF OPERA BAD, mal hamilton Re: LF: MF OPERA BAD, Graham LF: OP new version Run time error 13, SV8CS-Spiros Chimarios Re: LF: OP new version Run time error 13, Graham

Previous by Date:	Re: LF: Re: MF OPERA BAD, Graham
Next by Date:	Re: LF: Eb/N0 values for amateur modes, Paul Nicholson
Previous by Thread:	Re: LF: Re: MF OPERA BAD, Graham
Next by Thread:	Re: LF: Re: MF OPERA BAD, Graham
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]