Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LF: Would slower QRSS help?

from [Stefan Schäfer] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Would slower QRSS help?
From: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 20:30:26 +0100
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>,<B05C8EC5C7854E948A857BF8EDB83C9D@White> <[email protected]>,<[email protected]> <[email protected]> <91EDCA349BE942929730C480D5D64F7F@White>,<[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
RR, CFM.

Am 02.03.2014 20:25, schrieb Bob Raide:
Paul;
Jay and Stefan and you suggested I should transmit carrier for 1 hour on 29.49900 then move up 10 MHz [29.49901] for hour and back again a few times and then will start QRSS180.  Does that make sense? Bob
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  LF: DJ8WX very strong in 424 uHz, Stefan Schäfer
Next by Date:  RE: LF: Would slower QRSS help?, Bob Raide
Previous by Thread:  RE: LF: Would slower QRSS help?, Bob Raide
Next by Thread:  RE: LF: Would slower QRSS help?, Bob Raide
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]