Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: Would slower QRSS help? |
| From: | Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Sun, 02 Mar 2014 20:23:02 +0100 |
| Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected] |
| Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| References: | <[email protected]>,<B05C8EC5C7854E948A857BF8EDB83C9D@White> <[email protected]>,<[email protected]> <[email protected]> <91EDCA349BE942929730C480D5D64F7F@White> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 |
Hello Bob, Paul, Am 02.03.2014 20:06, schrieb Paul Nicholson: Unfortunetely my soundcard of the VLF PC cannot sample faster than 48 kS/s so i have to build up a separate RX. Also the frequency response of the current active antenna is not ideal for that frequency. It cuts off at arround 15 kHz.[...]After last night's test maybe a few more receivers will be listening on 29499 Hz. Bob, good luck in QRSS-180. I think it is the right choice, at least for Paul's RX. But i bet that Hartmut will pick up at least some traces too! 73, Stefan/DK7FC |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: DK7FC OP32 QRP ?, Stefan Schäfer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: LF: Would slower QRSS help?, Bob Raide |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Would slower QRSS help?, Paul Nicholson |
| Next by Thread: | RE: LF: Would slower QRSS help?, Bob Raide |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |