To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: LF: Would slower QRSS help? |
From: | LZ <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sun, 2 Mar 2014 18:22:18 +0100 |
Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected] |
Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
Importance: | normal |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]>,<B05C8EC5C7854E948A857BF8EDB83C9D@White>, <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Sensitivity: | Normal |
Hi Bob, Your signal is very coherent without phase glitches. Why not transmitting true "CW" avoiding any gaps and all that sideband stuff? Laura |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Would slower QRSS help?, Markus Vester |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Would slower QRSS help?, Paul Nicholson |
Previous by Thread: | RE: LF: Would slower QRSS help?, Bob Raide |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Would slower QRSS help?, Paul Nicholson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |