| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: LF: Would slower QRSS help? |
| From: | LZ <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Sun, 2 Mar 2014 18:22:18 +0100 |
| Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected] |
| Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
| Importance: | normal |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| References: | <[email protected]>,<B05C8EC5C7854E948A857BF8EDB83C9D@White>, <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| Sensitivity: | Normal |
Hi Bob, Your signal is very coherent without phase glitches. Why not transmitting true "CW" avoiding any gaps and all that sideband stuff? Laura |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Would slower QRSS help?, Markus Vester |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: Would slower QRSS help?, Paul Nicholson |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: LF: Would slower QRSS help?, Bob Raide |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Would slower QRSS help?, Paul Nicholson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |