If I could handle more voltage at the base of my vertical I have the capability of going to 5 KV plate volts @ 2 amps plate current. I would have to use a keyed CW mode to run this rig like that. But it would kick ass. I wouldn't want to run a steady state keydown carrier much over 4-5 KW. So OP 65 would have 3+ db jump over anything else right off the bat! But can't handle the ant input voltage-this is a log house and wood constructed garage for the shack-fire dept over 2 miles away in town-this place would burn to the ground-Bob
From:
[email protected]To:
[email protected]Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 21:55:50 +0100
Subject: Re: LF: Re[2]: Re: QRSS OP WSPR
We have still the last working OP2
qso mode , which can send ' I have two cats'
But the decode s/n is -20 dB ,
ROS-MF-2 is round -26 dB -28dB about
the same
as wspr-2 , but a full free running
data mode
At speeds less than 1 baud ,
would any one use such a mode , there was
a ROS 0.1 Baud
7/8 db lower , but very very slow
! ..
In the start , was the problem of
translating audio to rf on 136/500 ,
but now that
seems to be much less of a problem
73-G,
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 9:40 PM
Subject: LF: Re[2]: Re: QRSS OP WSPR
Dear LF enthusiasts!
my opinion is not very original in
English - in Russian I would write A4+++ :-)
"CQ R7NT K"
QRSS20
- 28' 40'" simple TX, visual decode, subjective report, random
time, QSO mode....
DFCW20 - 11' 4" little more
complicated TX, visual decode, subjective report, random time,
QSO mode....
"any call ++"
Qp32 - 32' simple TX,
software based decode/report, random time, no QSO mode....
WSPR-15
- 15' little more complicated TX, software based decode/report,
00', 15', 30', 45' times to start, no QSO mode........
QRSS20
~~=DFCW20 ~~=OP32 ~~=WSPR-15
Comparing OP32 and WSPR-15
(OP8/WSPR-2) is equally as comparing QRSS20 and DFCW20 (QRSS3/
DFCW3)
I personally like DFCW, JT9-5..10 more.... but I have the little
choise now....
...maybe WOLF agn?
73! Alex R7NT 136.73.ru
