Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | <[email protected]> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | LF: Re: RTTY vs. AMTOR |
| From: | Minto Witteveen <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Wed, 6 Mar 2013 16:50:55 +0100 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority :x-msmail-priority:importance:x-mailer:x-mimeole; bh=aypQu+HaG3j+8lCmlj8pTg+e6Jz+62oGdy13EltXjJw=; b=lhiGGkPbvW++2u7FhueC+zdzHBuIiqk2+0ozEhxEFPBSmP7jI+cPw+W8ubXUkgKVNu b8DVcRrNxVBpN6KKvJPdEI+tk1XpWdWgkl/L/ZK9AZ/bIpI6SgEpZkjqUEbRRXSoxTlb NP/VTZe/sm+W8adGRuQRCBmIcwVHaLbP+5csiMnQAvtmRE8oo+Fd6LeYVZb8K7hgLWyF ASB0BBVyMrjA9VuPC8+RwX6WRdk6A2mZil8MjOcp4mqXmxhWd+OvLf31yrmjgO2Cn2oV atuSWkJ7Qo/Wv2n+MVd8Wj0+7FTHFIgfreOZZCkPTQOjjoNeQPw8nHSqrOqQqLXdNJqR Go3w== |
| Importance: | Normal |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| References: | <[email protected]> <DF81F8D10F134701B797824F9B93DA4F@PcMinto> <CF6C61F12A384E648C56408F22F5083F@gnat> <A084B9DCD8B34898B4DD484086406269@PcMinto> <[email protected]> <84B77AD08F5F42849E6492B9048EC349@IBM7FFA209F07C> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
I am currently resticted to modes I can program myself in the PIC...AMTOR should be easy (I just have to find the encoding protocoll, but it seems very simple) I have not yet found a protocoll description of MFSK mode(s), i.e. how to generate these. If I need to use fldigi I have to reassemble my old 500 KHz transverter, that one uses my ft817 to drive it. 73's Minto pa3bca -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ceterum censeo Carthaginem delendam esse-----Original Message----- From: g3zjo Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 16:33 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: LF: RTTY vs. AMTOR Hi Stefan On 06/03/2013 15:09, Stefan Schäfer wrote: Eddie, Gary, Chris, Minto, MF,I've read a bit about RTTY and AMTOR in Wikipedia. Maybe AMTOR would help us a bit more, even when not used in that ARQ mode but also in beacon stile, due to the FEC? MultiPSK has AMTOR with FEC, yes we don't want ARQ do we. I have run it, same width as RTTY the FEC may help but its just as fast it is QSO mode. Again I will ask the question, why is MFSK not being considered I am running it at the moment on 478.200. MFSK4 is on Fldigi can you try it now.? Eddie Eddie, what was the name of the program that offers that mode for free? I cannot find your recent email where you already mentioned it.73, Stefan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LF: Re: RTTY test transmission, Minto Witteveen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: Testing RTTY 478.200kHz, g3zjo |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: RTTY vs. AMTOR, g3zjo |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: RTTY vs. AMTOR, g3zjo |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |