LF: Re: RTTY vs. AMTOR

[Minto Witteveen <minto.witteveen@gmail.com>]

I am currently resticted to modes I can program myself in the PIC...
AMTOR should be easy (I just have to find the encoding protocoll, but it 
seems very simple)
I have not yet found a protocoll description of MFSK mode(s), i.e. how to 
generate these.
If I need to use fldigi I have to reassemble my old 500 KHz transverter, 
that one uses my ft817 to drive it.
73's Minto pa3bca



--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem delendam esse
-----Original Message----- 
From: g3zjo
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 16:33
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: RTTY vs. AMTOR

Hi Stefan

On 06/03/2013 15:09, Stefan Schäfer wrote:
> Eddie, Gary, Chris, Minto, MF,
>
> I've read a bit about RTTY and AMTOR in Wikipedia. Maybe AMTOR would help 
> us a bit more, even when not used in that ARQ mode but also in beacon 
> stile, due to the FEC?
MultiPSK has AMTOR with FEC, yes we don't want ARQ do we. I have run it,
same width as RTTY the FEC may help but its just as fast it is QSO mode.

Again I will ask the question, why is MFSK not being considered I am
running it at the moment on 478.200. MFSK4 is on Fldigi can you try it now.?

Eddie
> Eddie, what was the name of the program that offers that mode for free? I 
> cannot find your recent email where you already mentioned it.
> 73, Stefan