Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

[Top] [All Lists]


To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: RTTY vs.MFSK
From: "Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 17:00:42 -0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=s1024; t=1362589241; bh=Ylbu33/r3IJdCgaT+XIlH2qlhiobkDsCBTRmJFCYB60=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=XVqeC5lm9YP5VizabP2F77oOAbIs7BdAxDsDPaQUzY8p86IvwmvJxB8CzIZ9fNx30C1p/fmE+t4fkVnNk4BYgl1BOxyW8jdweSuXAsnGIahBxwgs9WRuLK/zWlSDjXzkm9u7IeN5bBKrlZxGcA6yUQvc5WMf53FaSRHyN+J2UdQ=
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Stefan's RTTY beacon is starting to come through now. There have been
periodic strong bursts of signal on 438.2kHz over the last hour or so,
sounds like RTTY but fldigi not decoding using same settings as for Stefan -
so no idea who or what.
Chris, G4AYT.
----- Original Message ----- From: "g3zjo" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 4:53 PM
Subject: Re: LF: RTTY vs.MFSK

It is not that slow and if it is the difference between a QSO and not, it is worth a try.
I see something now what mode is that?

Amtor is about the same as the RTTY you have been trying.


On 06/03/2013 16:18, Stefan Schäfer wrote:
Am 06.03.2013 17:12, schrieb Stefan Schäfer:

I will now switch to MFSK-4, same QRG.
Sorry, aborted. It is much to slow and so it is uninteresting when
thinking about a real QSO mode..
How fast is AMTOR??

73, Stefan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>