This info might be useful.
Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stefan Schäfer" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 11:12 AM
Subject: Re: LF: RTTY vs.MFSK
Yes, i can try. However i have no idea if it will be "better". Not an
expert on the subject.
What i like is such a fast mode like RTTY, maybe 40 Baud would be fine
as well, but not much slower and no limited number of characters. I like
the function to just write down and the program sends it immediately :-)
So if there is another mode that has some error correction, it would be
an improvement i think. And AMTOR has it, if i understood correctly.
So what the hell is MFSK-4? Yes, Multi-Frequency-Shift-Keying with 4
tones, fine. But what does it offer? We can just try but i would like to
understand at least basically what i'm doing.
I will now switch to MFSK-4, same QRG.
Am 06.03.2013 16:33, schrieb g3zjo:
On 06/03/2013 15:09, Stefan Schäfer wrote:
MultiPSK has AMTOR with FEC, yes we don't want ARQ do we. I have run it, same width as RTTY the
FEC may help but its just as fast it is QSO mode.
Eddie, Gary, Chris, Minto, MF,
I've read a bit about RTTY and AMTOR in Wikipedia. Maybe AMTOR would help us a bit more, even
when not used in that ARQ mode but also in beacon stile, due to the FEC?
Again I will ask the question, why is MFSK not being considered I am running it at the moment on
478.200. MFSK4 is on Fldigi can you try it now.?
Eddie, what was the name of the program that offers that mode for free? I cannot find your recent
email where you already mentioned it.