Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

[Top] [All Lists]


To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: RTTY vs.MFSK
From: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 11:48:42 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=q20121106; t=1362588523; bh=AEDgSt2bv3anjLYC7eaN9j/JijLOLYlhAYM7WQZkZyA=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=CJgqxto0yvzKNot9W8D/qAImXPY2StY9n3PaT9Zo8daiD1u/XfPXNFbePAF83VSG8 5dVm5s5TSEw3qZ/YKioXNFJ3MkoHiLO3i5c2Ae71uAvY/rDjoQXHkCXx5LmEzbbW5s XjzJe3sNRGXFWsrfY8H+ZlJ74kk84v5HBHBFbHqRDjrAoEB5p20lNxHHktbQy5D2K6 SBHPDbvqTF9Wnu0deE0mBK50brdaj7Ymqd20u4Hh+UD2s881HMyHUPL8f+XQCicqa7 qEa3WT35Dog0HMeZqFlVQuMjmqhO/9PPo6/5aHG9XYOmfcTZQo42fiYPWS37BwlrKR Dp1ukfGbhsTgA==
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

This info might be useful.


----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Schäfer" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 11:12 AM
Subject: Re: LF: RTTY vs.MFSK

Hi Eddie,

Yes, i can try. However i have no idea if it will be "better". Not an
expert on the subject.
What i like is such a fast mode like RTTY, maybe 40 Baud would be fine
as well, but not much slower and no limited number of characters. I like
the function to just write down and the program sends it immediately :-)
So if there is another mode that has some error correction, it would be
an improvement i think. And AMTOR has it, if i understood correctly.
So what the hell is MFSK-4? Yes, Multi-Frequency-Shift-Keying with 4
tones, fine. But what does it offer? We can just try but i would like to
understand at least basically what i'm doing.

I will now switch to MFSK-4, same QRG.

73, Stefan

Am 06.03.2013 16:33, schrieb g3zjo:
Hi Stefan

On 06/03/2013 15:09, Stefan Schäfer wrote:
Eddie, Gary, Chris, Minto, MF,

I've read a bit about RTTY and AMTOR in Wikipedia. Maybe AMTOR would help us a bit more, even when not used in that ARQ mode but also in beacon stile, due to the FEC?
MultiPSK has AMTOR with FEC, yes we don't want ARQ do we. I have run it, same width as RTTY the FEC may help but its just as fast it is QSO mode.
Again I will ask the question, why is MFSK not being considered I am running it at the moment on
478.200. MFSK4 is on Fldigi can you try it now.?
Eddie, what was the name of the program that offers that mode for free? I cannot find your recent email where you already mentioned it.
73, Stefan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>