Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: RTTY vs. AMTOR

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: RTTY vs. AMTOR
From: g3zjo <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 15:59:54 +0000
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1
On 06/03/2013 15:50, Minto Witteveen wrote:
I am currently resticted to modes I can program myself in the PIC...
AMTOR should be easy (I just have to find the encoding protocoll, but it seems very simple) I have not yet found a protocoll description of MFSK mode(s), i.e. how to generate these.
If I need to use fldigi I have to reassemble my old 500 KHz
transverter, that one uses my ft817 to drive it.
73's Minto pa3bca



--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem delendam esse
-----Original Message----- From: g3zjo
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 16:33
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: RTTY vs. AMTOR

Hi Stefan

On 06/03/2013 15:09, Stefan Schäfer wrote:
Eddie, Gary, Chris, Minto, MF,

I've read a bit about RTTY and AMTOR in Wikipedia. Maybe AMTOR would help us a bit more, even when not used in that ARQ mode but also in beacon stile, due to the FEC?
MultiPSK has AMTOR with FEC, yes we don't want ARQ do we. I have run it,
same width as RTTY the FEC may help but its just as fast it is QSO mode.

Again I will ask the question, why is MFSK not being considered I am
running it at the moment on 478.200. MFSK4 is on Fldigi can you try it now.?
Eddie
Eddie, what was the name of the program that offers that mode for free? I cannot find your recent email where you already mentioned it.
73, Stefan






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>