Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: RTTY vs.MFSK

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: RTTY vs.MFSK
From: g3zjo <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 16:53:12 +0000
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <DF81F8D10F134701B797824F9B93DA4F@PcMinto> <CF6C61F12A384E648C56408F22F5083F@gnat> <A084B9DCD8B34898B4DD484086406269@PcMinto> <[email protected]> <84B77AD08F5F42849E6492B9048EC349@IBM7FFA209F07C> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1

It is not that slow and if it is the difference between a QSO and not, it is worth a try.

I see something now what mode is that?

Amtor is about the same as the RTTY you have been trying.

Eddie

On 06/03/2013 16:18, Stefan Schäfer wrote:

Am 06.03.2013 17:12, schrieb Stefan Schäfer:
[...]

I will now switch to MFSK-4, same QRG.

Sorry, aborted. It is much to slow and so it is uninteresting when thinking about a real QSO mode..
How fast is AMTOR??

73, Stefan





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>