Hi Markus
I had no luck with Stefan last evening , no asterisks and no echo
2315 5 -29 -0.8 1432.73 0.00
2320 10 -12 0.2 1439.73 0.00
2325 5 -29 0.4 1428.55 0.00
2330 10 -12 0.0 1439.73 0.00
2335 4 -30 0.0 1420.20 0.00
2340 10 -14 0.2 1439.73 0.00
2345 6 -29 0.2 1427.61 0.00
2350 10 -19 0.2 1439.73 0.00
2355 10 -23 0.4 1429.87 0.00
0000 10 -18 0.2 1439.73 0.00
0005 10 -25 0.0 1429.84 0.00
0010 10 -17 0.2 1439.73 0.00
0015 0 -33 0.9 1456.33 0.00
0020 10 -12 0.0 1439.73 0.00
0025 1 -33 0.0 1451.72 0.00
0030 10 -12 0.0 1439.73 0.00
0035 10 -26 0.2 1429.83 0.00 DF6NM GN ALL
0040 0 -34 0.4 1440.21 0.00 000AAA 000AAA RA90
I managed to decode your signal
even if it looks like you are slightly out of sync.
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/16381257/capt14.jpg
LA5VNA Steinar
loc:JO59jq
Mal and spam filtering: STRONG
www.opera.no
Den 30.10.2012 11:45, skrev Markus Vester:
> Similar here, most (but not all) slots decoded successfully,
but mostly with asterisks. Strange that the quiet slots at odd
ten minute multiples also achieved 10 sync points - perhaps the
echo effect again? The first line went wrong only because my decoder
was still set to 5 minutes.
>
> Even with 1 Hz tolerance the CPU is getting pretty busy - maybe in a future
> version we could select whether we want multiple decodes or not? On one of my
> machines I can't use 48 kS/s for WSPR and WSJTx because that samplerate is
> too far off, so being able to choose between 12 and 48 kS/s aquisition would
> also be useful.
>
> Best 73,
> Markus (DF6NM)
>
> 0040 10 -24 -0.6 1940.53 0.00 000AAA 000AAA RA90
> 0050 0 -37 0.0 1938.40 0.00
> 0100 10 -9 1.7 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK
> 0110 10 -18 0.4 1939.83 0.00
> 0120********* 1.7 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK
> 0130 10 -18 0.4 1939.83 0.00
> 0140********* 1.7 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK
> 0150 10 -19 0.9 1939.85 0.00
> 0200********* 1.7 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK
> 0210 10 -17 -1.3 1939.75 0.00
> 0220 10 -9 2.2 1939.83 0.00
> 0230 10 -20 0.9 1939.85 0.00
> 0240********* 1.3 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK
> 0250 10 -17 0.4 1939.83 0.00
> 0300 10 -9 1.3 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK
> 0310 10 -19 0.4 1939.83 0.00
> 0320********* 1.3 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK
> 0330 10 -18 0.4 1939.83 0.00
> 0340********* 1.3 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK
> 0350 10 -18 0.4 1939.83 0.00
> 0400********* 1.3 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK
> 0410 10 -18 0.4 1939.83 0.00
> 0420********* 1.3 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK
> 0430 10 -19 0.4 1939.83 0.00
> 0440********* 1.3 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK
> 0450 10 -19 0.4 1939.83 0.00
> 0500********* 1.3 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK
> 0510 10 -19 0.4 1939.83 0.00
> 0520********* 1.3 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK
> 0530 10 -18 0.4 1939.83 0.00
> 0540********* 1.3 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK
> 0550 10 -18 -1.7 1939.89 0.00
> 0600 2 -35 0.9 1939.85 0.00
>
>
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-----
> Von: Terry GW0EZY <[email protected]>
> An: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]>
> Verschickt: Di, 30 Okt 2012 2:36 am
> Betreff: LF: RE: JT9-10 Decode DK7FC
>
> Decode OK but same again – Sync and dB values shown as **** (usually
> indicates values exceed expected)
>
> 0120********* 0.9 1138.38 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK
>
> I have reduced the tolerance to +/- 10. I checked JT9-30 and the Wide Graph
> scale shifts again requiring another retune and increase of FFT Bins/Pixel to
> get 1140 kHz on screen (136.3 + 1140)
>
> 73 Terry
>
>
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Terry GW0EZY
> Sent: 30 October 2012 01:14
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: LF: JT9-10 Decode DK7FC
>
>
> A decode of your JT9-10 transmission. I wonder why the Sync and dB values are
> shown as **** ??
>
> 0100********* 0.4 1138.38 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK
>
> Waiting for JT9-30 ??
>
> I thought you would prefer to stay with BS – sigh!
>
> 73 Terry
>
>
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stefan Schäfer
> Sent: 30 October 2012 00:49
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: LF: DK7FC-DF6NM
>
>
>
> Am 30.10.2012 01:41, schrieb Terry GW0EZY:
> Stefan getting regular decodes from you – every 10 minutes. Will also try
> your JT9-10. Let us all know if another frequency offset is required.
>
> No, i'll stay at 137.44 kHz over the night.
>
>
>
> Sending emails is a pain!
> Is it? I like it :-)
>
>
> 73, Stefan
>
>
|
