Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: RE: JT9-10 Decode DK7FC

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: RE: JT9-10 Decode DK7FC
From: Markus Vester <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 06:45:36 -0400 (EDT)
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20110426; t=1351593937; bh=52EqJRDPuluFiDVyG1UCrTNeArnLErVLqwQJffz+wZQ=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=QykalQv/fFhbFCEhokShxROEPfCX81o7MnQHtbhNGD04zm6XMqH1rZUPFv0PnqVte GGglI6Ws9CWc4AeNcgrQYHd1fGwzCKCsTeN3NObzjIcRlO3EJov4eEh7clogwzDgEk W5DuQbNMeI9mGRYCZzPk2Be+uczDBUjwNHdm7CwM=
In-reply-to: <87D0548217184BC58AF939DEA4CF768C@intelp4>
References: <87D0548217184BC58AF939DEA4CF768C@intelp4>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Similar here, most (but not all) slots decoded successfully, but mostly with asterisks. Strange that the quiet slots at odd ten minute multiples also achieved 10 sync points - perhaps the echo effect again? The first line went wrong only because my decoder was still set to 5 minutes.  
 
Even with 1 Hz tolerance the CPU is getting pretty busy - maybe in a future version we could select whether we want multiple decodes or not? On one of my machines I can't use 48 kS/s for WSPR and WSJTx because that samplerate is too far off, so being able to choose between 12 and 48 kS/s aquisition would also be useful.
 
Best 73,
Markus (DF6NM)
 
0040  10  -24  -0.6 1940.53  0.00   000AAA 000AAA RA90   
0050   0  -37   0.0 1938.40  0.00
0100  10   -9   1.7 1939.83  0.00    DK7FC JN49IK        
0110  10  -18   0.4 1939.83  0.00
0120*********   1.7 1939.83  0.00    DK7FC JN49IK        
0130  10  -18   0.4 1939.83  0.00
0140*********   1.7 1939.83  0.00    DK7FC JN49IK        
0150  10  -19   0.9 1939.85  0.00
0200*********   1.7 1939.83  0.00    DK7FC JN49IK        
0210  10  -17  -1.3 1939.75  0.00
0220  10   -9   2.2 1939.83  0.00
0230  10  -20   0.9 1939.85  0.00
0240*********   1.3 1939.83  0.00    DK7FC JN49IK        
0250  10  -17   0.4 1939.83  0.00
0300  10   -9   1.3 1939.83  0.00    DK7FC JN49IK        
0310  10  -19   0.4 1939.83  0.00
0320*********   1.3 1939.83  0.00    DK7FC JN49IK        
0330  10  -18   0.4 1939.83  0.00
0340*********   1.3 1939.83  0.00    DK7FC JN49IK        
0350  10  -18   0.4 1939.83  0.00
0400*********   1.3 1939.83  0.00    DK7FC JN49IK        
0410  10  -18   0.4 1939.83  0.00
0420*********   1.3 1939.83  0.00    DK7FC JN49IK        
0430  10  -19   0.4 1939.83  0.00
0440*********   1.3 1939.83  0.00    DK7FC JN49IK        
0450  10  -19   0.4 1939.83  0.00
0500*********   1.3 1939.83  0.00    DK7FC JN49IK        
0510  10  -19   0.4 1939.83  0.00
0520*********   1.3 1939.83  0.00    DK7FC JN49IK        
0530  10  -18   0.4 1939.83  0.00
0540*********   1.3 1939.83  0.00    DK7FC JN49IK        
0550  10  -18  -1.7 1939.89  0.00
0600   2  -35   0.9 1939.85  0.00


-----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: Terry GW0EZY <[email protected]>
An: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]>
Verschickt: Di, 30 Okt 2012 2:36 am
Betreff: LF: RE: JT9-10 Decode DK7FC

Decode OK but same again – Sync and dB values shown as **** (usually indicates values exceed expected)
 
0120*********   0.9 1138.38  0.00    DK7FC JN49IK
 
I have reduced the tolerance to +/- 10. I checked JT9-30 and the Wide Graph scale shifts again requiring another retune and increase of FFT Bins/Pixel to get 1140 kHz on screen (136.3 + 1140)
 
73 Terry
 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Terry GW0EZY
Sent: 30 October 2012 01:14
To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: JT9-10 Decode DK7FC
 
A decode of your JT9-10 transmission. I wonder why the Sync and dB values are shown as **** ??
 
0100*********   0.4 1138.38  0.00    DK7FC JN49IK 
 
Waiting for JT9-30 ??
 
I thought you would prefer to stay with BS – sigh!
 
73 Terry
 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stefan Schäfer
Sent: 30 October 2012 00:49
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: DK7FC-DF6NM
 

Am 30.10.2012 01:41, schrieb Terry GW0EZY:
Stefan getting regular decodes from you – every 10 minutes. Will also try your JT9-10. Let us all know if another frequency offset is required.

No, i'll stay at 137.44 kHz over the night.

 
Sending emails is a pain!
Is it? I like it :-)


73, Stefan
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>