Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: RE: JT9-10 Decode DK7FC |
| From: | Markus Vester <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Tue, 30 Oct 2012 06:45:36 -0400 (EDT) |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20110426; t=1351593937; bh=52EqJRDPuluFiDVyG1UCrTNeArnLErVLqwQJffz+wZQ=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=QykalQv/fFhbFCEhokShxROEPfCX81o7MnQHtbhNGD04zm6XMqH1rZUPFv0PnqVte GGglI6Ws9CWc4AeNcgrQYHd1fGwzCKCsTeN3NObzjIcRlO3EJov4eEh7clogwzDgEk W5DuQbNMeI9mGRYCZzPk2Be+uczDBUjwNHdm7CwM= |
| In-reply-to: | <87D0548217184BC58AF939DEA4CF768C@intelp4> |
| References: | <87D0548217184BC58AF939DEA4CF768C@intelp4> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
|
Similar here, most (but not all) slots decoded successfully, but mostly with asterisks. Strange that the quiet slots at odd ten minute multiples also achieved 10 sync points - perhaps the echo effect again? The first line went wrong only because my decoder was still set to 5 minutes.
Even with 1 Hz tolerance the CPU is getting pretty busy - maybe in a future version we could select whether we want multiple decodes or not? On one of my machines I can't use 48 kS/s for WSPR and WSJTx because that samplerate is too far off, so being able to choose between 12 and 48 kS/s aquisition would also be useful.
Best 73,
Markus (DF6NM)
0040 10 -24 -0.6 1940.53 0.00 000AAA 000AAA RA90
0050 0 -37 0.0 1938.40 0.00 0100 10 -9 1.7 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK 0110 10 -18 0.4 1939.83 0.00 0120********* 1.7 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK 0130 10 -18 0.4 1939.83 0.00 0140********* 1.7 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK 0150 10 -19 0.9 1939.85 0.00 0200********* 1.7 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK 0210 10 -17 -1.3 1939.75 0.00 0220 10 -9 2.2 1939.83 0.00 0230 10 -20 0.9 1939.85 0.00 0240********* 1.3 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK 0250 10 -17 0.4 1939.83 0.00 0300 10 -9 1.3 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK 0310 10 -19 0.4 1939.83 0.00 0320********* 1.3 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK 0330 10 -18 0.4 1939.83 0.00 0340********* 1.3 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK 0350 10 -18 0.4 1939.83 0.00 0400********* 1.3 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK 0410 10 -18 0.4 1939.83 0.00 0420********* 1.3 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK 0430 10 -19 0.4 1939.83 0.00 0440********* 1.3 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK 0450 10 -19 0.4 1939.83 0.00 0500********* 1.3 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK 0510 10 -19 0.4 1939.83 0.00 0520********* 1.3 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK 0530 10 -18 0.4 1939.83 0.00 0540********* 1.3 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK 0550 10 -18 -1.7 1939.89 0.00 0600 2 -35 0.9 1939.85 0.00 Von: Terry GW0EZY <[email protected]> An: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]> Verschickt: Di, 30 Okt 2012 2:36 am Betreff: LF: RE: JT9-10 Decode DK7FC Decode OK but same again – Sync and dB values shown as **** (usually indicates values exceed expected)
0120********* 0.9 1138.38 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK
I have reduced the tolerance to +/- 10. I checked JT9-30 and the Wide Graph scale shifts again requiring another retune and increase of FFT Bins/Pixel to get 1140 kHz on screen (136.3 + 1140)
73 Terry
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Terry GW0EZY
Sent: 30 October 2012 01:14 To: [email protected] Subject: LF: JT9-10 Decode DK7FC A decode of your JT9-10 transmission. I wonder why the Sync and dB values are shown as **** ??
0100********* 0.4 1138.38 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK
Waiting for JT9-30 ??
I thought you would prefer to stay with BS – sigh!
73 Terry
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stefan Schäfer
Sent: 30 October 2012 00:49 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: LF: DK7FC-DF6NM Am 30.10.2012 01:41, schrieb Terry GW0EZY: Stefan getting regular decodes from you – every 10 minutes. Will also try your JT9-10. Let us all know if another frequency offset is required.
No, i'll stay at 137.44 kHz over the night. Sending emails is a pain!
Is it? I like it :-)
73, Stefan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: JT9 what is the qso mode exactly ?, g3zjo |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: LF: JT9 what is the qso mode exactly ?, Terry GW0EZY |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: RE: JT9-10 Decode DK7FC, Terry GW0EZY |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: RE: JT9-10 Decode DK7FC, Steinar Aanesland |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |