Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: no decodes, help needed

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: no decodes, help needed
From: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 00:19:54 +0100
In-reply-to: <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FB5090C@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be>
References: <[email protected]> <46A9A1D9FC954A658216B197782524BF@White> <891CD59233F844C283BAC09A2AAA04BA@White> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>,<[email protected]> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FB5090C@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
:-( Maybe this is due to phase glitches coming from the VAC, SL, and JT9, all working in series? Would be an explanation, if the timing is not the problem.

I guess i have to wait for the update that allows an extended frequency range..

73, Stefan


Am 28.10.2012 20:16, schrieb Rik Strobbe:

Wolf, Stefan, all,

 

that's what I got here:

 

1750   8  -23   0.4 1430.59  0.00   DK7FC TEST 5W        
1754   6  -24   0.4 1430.59  0.00   DK7FC TEST 5W        
1758   7  -24   0.4 1430.43  0.00   DK7FC TEST 5W        
1810   8  -23   0.4 1430.59  0.00   DK7FC TEST 5W        
1814  10  -23   0.4 1430.35  0.00   DK7FC TEST 5W        
1822   5  -25   0.4 1430.43  0.00   DK7FC TEST 5W        
1826  10  -21  -0.1 1450.94  0.00   CQ DF2JP JO31        
1830  10  -21  -0.1 1450.94  0.00   CQ DF2JP JO31        
1834  10  -20   0.1 1450.94  0.00   CQ DF2JP JO31        
1838  10  -19   0.0 1450.94  0.00   CQ DF2JP JO31        
1842  10  -21  -0.1 1450.94  0.00   CQ DF2JP JO31        
1846  10  -19  -0.1 1450.94  0.00   CQ DF2JP JO31        
1850  10  -21   0.0 1450.94  0.00   CQ DF2JP JO31        
1854  10  -21   0.0 1450.94  0.00   CQ DF2JP JO31        
1858  10  -21  -0.1 1450.94  0.00   CQ DF2JP JO31        
1902   4  -26   0.4 1430.35  0.00   DK7FC TEST 5W 
       

Despite the fact that DK7FC produces a much stronger trace DF2JP gets better decodes.

 

73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T

 


Van: [email protected] [[email protected]] namens wolf_dl4yhf [[email protected]]
Verzonden: zondag 28 oktober 2012 20:06
To: [email protected]
Onderwerp: Re: LF: no decodes, help needed

Am 28.10.2012 19:59, schrieb wolf_dl4yhf:
Still many more decodes from DK7FC, even though stronger, than from DF2JP.

Excuses, that should have read:
... less decodes from DK7FC, even through stronger than DF2JP..

Actually, now each of DF2JP's overs is decoded, but (almost) none from Stefan even though his signal is still stronger in JO42 .


73, Wolf  DL4YHF .


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>