To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Re: LF: Re: Re: Re: DK0SWF antenna |
From: | [email protected] |
Date: | Sat, 08 Sep 2012 23:50:18 +0200 |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hi Klaus,
thanks for the report. just had a qso with DK0SWF. he gave 445, I rcvd him 599 plus. GL Uwe/dj8wx Von: [email protected] Gesendet: 08.09.2012 17:35 An: [email protected] Betreff: Re: LF: Re: Re: Re: DK0SWF antenna Geri, Mal & Group
Mal, don't be so harsh with them. These guys are obviously new to MF and
they have a real problem handling a big vertical (ex BC stn "SWF"). I had a qso
with the guy on 80m and he told me they have QRM > S9. A big vertical is
definitely a good tx-antenna but for rx it is a completely different story as
you surely know.
But Mal you are right they caused a bit of a havoc not beeing able to
receive. But as Geri said: a one night ...
Geri maybe you can relay my SWL report to them:
DK0SWF was 599 in the beginning, later (21:00UTC) 579
I also received:
OM1II 559
DF0WD 579
DJ8WX 56/79
DJ2LF 59+9 ((only 11km!)
Sri Mal, I could not receive you
RX: Flex5000, Ant: bandpass loop as per M0BMU in Garden app 4m agl
73
de Klaus
DJ6LB
JN59mm
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Dial frequency - or better not?, Markus Vester |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: DK0SWF, Holger 'Geri' DK8KW DI2BO W1KW |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: Re: Re: DK0SWF antenna, Stefan Schäfer |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: Re: Re: DK0SWF antenna, C. Groeger |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |