|
He has a good TX signal but cannot Receive.
It is no problem for normal CW to work on 137. I have
worked over 30 countries in the past.
QRSS is not necessary for those that make an effort
especially around EU and as far as Moscow
de g3kev
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2012 4:51
PM
Subject: Re: LF: MF Allocation
(was:VX9MRC 504.1 kHz)
This is the eternal question...
QRSS is quite easier and
most probably the only solution for most of us BUT: We are a quite a large lot
to look forward "operator-hands-and-ears" CW
activity.
If 137 was more populated, maybe wouldn't it be so hard to
QSO in regular CW, even with veeeeeeeery low ERPs.
That should be
peanuts for you Stefan, once you get on the air another monstrous
signal.
On MF, the problem is similar, although antenna efficiency is
greater, and CW should be easier.
Passionned with 160 meters, I would also
focus on CW for MF 630 meters, with probably a bit of slow CW beaconing or
QSO, but just for fun. The no-computer approach is something of a
challenge.
Remember, CW is "Man versus Machine
!!!".
73
Ben
>
Message du 07/06/12 14:32
> De : "Stefan Schäfer"
> A :
[email protected]
> Copie à :
> Objet : Re: LF:
VX9MRC 504.1 kHz
>
> Hi Ben,
>
> I do not intend to
run so much power. I will rather build a small PA and a lossy coil. A lossy
coil has a lower Q and a braoder bandwidth and so i will not need to adjust
the resonance when making QSY within the band, hopefully. That makes things
easier.
> On MF i plan to focus on plain handgiven CW. No QRSS, no
grabber, maybe even no computer. However Speclab would be fine to get an
overview of the band activity and offers nice filter and noise reduction
tools...
> I'm really excited how the band will be populated. It's not
so far away from 1800 kHz and an ordinary amateur radio antenna, e.g. a
dipole for 80m, configured as a T antenna will work reasonable if a suitable
earth is available.
>
> But what's the problem in France? You
have so much space for large antennas, don't you? Or do you live in Paris
City? :-)
>
> 73, Stefan/DK7FC
>
> Am 07.06.2012
14:17, schrieb manginbenoit.pro:
Lucky you Stefan, lucky you ! Probably the reason for your KW
ERP.
>
> My "reasonable" setup indicates me that
triple that value could be necessary...
>
> CU
there
>
> Ben
>
>
>
>
Message du 07/06/12 14:12
> > De : "Stefan Schäfer"
>
> A : [email protected]
>
> Copie à :
> > Objet : Re: LF: VX9MRC 504.1 kHz
>
>
> > I only heared some rumours about the permission
starting January, 1st,
> > 2013, here in DL. Also i heard
rumours that a permit is given out on the
> > Ham Radio 2012
(http://www.hamradio-friedrichshafen.de/ham-en/index.php)
> > , which would be in 3 weeks! But i guess 2013 is more
realistic.
> >
> > Time to build a suitable loading
coil for MF. I will need about 240 uH
> > only...
> >
> > 73, Stefan/DK7FC
> >
> > Am 07.06.2012
13:49, schrieb manginbenoit.pro:
> > > Are there other EU
countries (apart from the British Isles)
> > > granting MF
access to the amateur service so fast ?
> > >
> >
> We in France still did not hear even the smallest whisper from our
> > > tutelage administration. Or maybe am I not well
informed.
> > >
> > > 73
> >
>
> > > Ben
> >
> >
|
