To: | "[email protected]" <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Poll announcement |
From: | Daniele Tincani <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sun, 3 Jun 2012 16:18:20 +0100 (BST) |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1338736700; bh=xII/yTrYrovZ5E4bFkYT2AJj+ykwRx8JMCrHQKYr92Q=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=HxJhN2s1Myfg6u6nYtAOwnFMjpJqsVUlOWNEAKUpqQlXVuA/+HjDte1WoygUjlO0laf0CqFeSszNTv77vVRqvZwit+JRJ3Krmabwv5GFYf1Jlh7p2tInm1s10apDcHzPMGmVROXgQVxzWIFxDuZUJQpLlS6hgh+ebvi0B0lyruI= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=dLAON5e5DBBU4p5EhdwgSjID3fOS8ntqekXovSi0v0Z87zDyybXXHiVYWkd/7NaAU2mWw0Gx/PC9+gsdjxwCYNjKnhq5LyJnQwMHorwrogpL8K2wvUiiefd/3jIP+wrRGvH1SVQLA4prNQ74gJ9EeILiNwxg43HYUKn3JviuCSk=; |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <CAD+JcHTNT7A_TRzem57ERf6-0gx1io_Y0ydSv6_LOapNFLJZHw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Honestly I'm a bit confused by this (long) discussion taking place on two lists at the same time :-) I observe that it is not rare that the same subject (e.g. LF/VLF radio) is covered by different lists on different platforms with no conflicts and usually the members of one list are not asked to decide if another list should survive or not. Best regards Daniele Da: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]> A: [email protected] Inviato: Domenica 3 Giugno 2012 17:03 Oggetto: Re: LF: Poll announcement
Of course all those who like yahoo have no problem to take part in the
poll. But there may be some who say "i won't bother with this yahoo
stuff". Those will have no real chance to take part. Based on a yahoo
poll it is advantaged to pro-yahoo in advance.
Anyway i will subsrcibe and try to give my vote, as long as i don't need an extra yahoo account for that. It was easy to subscribe to the list but i'm afraid that taking part in a poll assumes to have a yahoo account. Then i cannot see the poll as really valid. In that case, someone may have in mind that i vote for blacksheep. Two separate groups would be a bad compromise and they would always try to pull members from the other group to themselves. Anyway i would agree to such a compromise. On the blacksheep refelector we have been ONE GROUP, now we may loose a minority, maybe. For what? MORE MORE MORE Very sad! BTW Please don't forget those who are not so familiar with the english language! They may be very LF interested but can't follow the discussion and tell their opinion in an understandable way. Minorities, but worth to think about! Stefan/DK7FC Am 03.06.2012 15:57, schrieb John Gould:
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Re: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Re: Gettign rid of Black Sheep, Roelof Bakker |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: Re: O.T.: Reflector status, Stewart Bryant |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Poll announcement, Stefan Schäfer |
Next by Thread: | LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep, Alberto di Bene |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |