Hi Eddie,
I don't think this is my signal. The DFCW shift is 3 mHz, so my upper
frequency is 8969.98150 Hz. BTW my FFT and scroll rate settings are the
same as used in the typical DFCW-6000 SL instance used by many VLF
Grabber operator, like yours :-) So it should be easy to compare the traces.
Unfortunately the upload of my normal LF and VLF grabber is off now.
However you can follow the transmission in the 424 uHz window at
http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber2.html
One call takes about 3 days :-) Soon i will try QRO and DFCW-60000, just
for fun :-)
Good luck anyway and thanks for watching for the weak signal.
73, Stefan/DK7FC
Am 08.04.2012 11:49, schrieb qrss:
Stefan
There is a common start / finish minute on the dots in the
att.capture.HH.m3 to the best of my measurement ability, they
certainly coincide with your TX periods.
73 Eddie G3ZJO
Grabber:- http://g3zjo.bplaced.net/index.htm
Also :- http://www.g3zjo.talktalk.net/vlfgrabber.htm
On 08/04/2012 08:20, Stefan Schäfer wrote:
Hi Gerhard,
Yes, of course. I just meant the "official" researchers who do that
work as their job to earn money and (have to) publish their work on
conferences and in various papers. For them it is important to be
"the first" one who describes a phenomen. We are in the situation to
do what we want to do, just for fun and extremely relaxed :-) If our
work is "new" then it is fine and if it is "re-inventing the wheel"
then it is fine too :-)
73, Stefan/DK7FC
Am 07.04.2012 15:51, schrieb Gerhard Hickl:
Stefan !
I think WE ARE researchers in some way. Maybe not all of us do have the
theoretical background which is "necessary" do to "real" research
(whatever that means) but sometimes I think this could be an advantage.
73
OE3GHB
Gerhard
|
