To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: VLF: Local VLF tests... |
From: | Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sun, 08 Apr 2012 09:20:13 +0200 |
In-reply-to: | <1333806691.2036.3.camel@gerhard-desktop-acer> |
References: | <[email protected]> <1333806691.2036.3.camel@gerhard-desktop-acer> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 |
Hi Gerhard,Yes, of course. I just meant the "official" researchers who do that work as their job to earn money and (have to) publish their work on conferences and in various papers. For them it is important to be "the first" one who describes a phenomen. We are in the situation to do what we want to do, just for fun and extremely relaxed :-) If our work is "new" then it is fine and if it is "re-inventing the wheel" then it is fine too :-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 07.04.2012 15:51, schrieb Gerhard Hickl: Stefan ! I think WE ARE researchers in some way. Maybe not all of us do have the theoretical background which is "necessary" do to "real" research (whatever that means) but sometimes I think this could be an advantage. 73 OE3GHB Gerhard |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: VO1NA, victor13 |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: VO1NA, Michel Brunel |
Previous by Thread: | RE: VLF: Local VLF tests..., Rik Strobbe |
Next by Thread: | Re: VLF: Local VLF tests..., qrss |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |