Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: Topband ? |
| From: | John Rabson <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Fri, 2 Mar 2012 11:35:33 +0100 |
| In-reply-to: | <CACQ0XpLG-S=a9sLhqy_DEAT_MeXBnn88ngGoyoGUTtDw4Br9EQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| References: | <CAA8k23SoHnXMRFmc6xkBQ4dmFmeFWF_W71Sz6QnxzSm5hUTqZA@mail.gmail.com> <CACQ0XpLG-S=a9sLhqy_DEAT_MeXBnn88ngGoyoGUTtDw4Br9EQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
On 2 Mar 2012, at 11:18CET, Daniel Ankers wrote: > But Shirley it's not been Topband since 30th January 1998 when 136kHz > became available? > Even earlier. Remember 73 kHz? The practice of referring to bands by wavelength goes back quite a long way. Does anyone remember Radio Luxembourg on 49 m broadcast giving its wavelength to 2 decimal places of metres? John F5VLF > Dan MD1CLV > > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: RSGB Membership - Bit off topic., David Pratt |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: LF: RSGB Membership - Bit off topic., James Cowburn |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Topband ?, Daniel Ankers |
| Next by Thread: | LF: Re: Topband ?, mal hamilton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |